• Eleonora Shkolnik Ariel University
  • Serhiі Iholkin National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine
Keywords: ecological consciousness, ecological behavior, ecological safety, new ecological paradigm, managerial decisions in the field of environmental protection


Environmental problems and the urgency of their solution requires changes in the environmental perception of citizens, the study of environmental consciousness and the factors influencing it. The formation of environmental values in the society and raising the environmental awareness of the population is an important task of the state environmental policy. The article deals with the works of foreign scientists devoted to the study of environmental consciousness. The problem of different scientific approaches to the consideration of the concept of "ecological consciousness" is actualized, the analysis of foreign scientific literature on this issue is carried out. The importance of environmental beliefs, as well as their relationship with socio-demographic characteristics, is emphasized. In particular, factors such as education, age, gender, and political ideology have been consistently identified as factors that correlate with environmental concerns. It is emphasized that young and well-educated people are most concerned about the environment, and the close relationship between social status, awareness and social participation underscores such a crucial role as ideology. It is shown that in foreign scientific literature there is a problem in defining the term "ecological consciousness" and separating it from other, similar in terms of content. The study of environmental consciousness has sometimes evolved under other names, such as "environmental sensitivity" or "environmental concern".

Factors of influence on the environmental awareness of citizens are studied, including socio-demographic (education, age, gender, population density in a certain territory and population division into urban and rural residents) and political and economic (income level, GDP per capita, political situation and country's economic level). Recommendations are given to raise the level of environmental awareness of citizens.


1. Adeola, F.O. (1998). Cross‐national environmentalism differentials: Empirical evidence from core and noncore nations //Society & Natural Resources. (Vols. 11). No. 4. P. 339-364 [in English].
2. Babalola, Y.T. & Babalola, A.D. & Okhale, F.O. (2010). Awareness and accessibility of environmental information in Nigeria: Evidence from Delta State //Library Philosophy and Practice. P. 1 [in English].
3. Brechin, S.R. & Kempton, W. (1994). Global environmentalism: a challenge to the postmaterialism thesis? //Social science quarterly. (Vols. 75). No. 2. P. 245-269 [in English].
4. Brieger, S.A. (2018). Social identity and environmental concern: The importance of contextual effects //Environment and Behavior [in English].
5. Catton Jr, W.R..& Dunlap, R.E. (1980). A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology //American behavioral scientist. (Vols. 24). No. 1. P. 15-47 [in English].
6. Clayton, S., Myers, G. (2015). Conservation psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature [in English].
7. Corral-Verdugo, V. & Armendariz, L.I. (2000). The “new environmental paradigm” in a Mexican community //The Journal of Environmental Education. (Vols. 31). No. 3. P. 25-31 [in English].
8. Dunlap, R.E. & Gallup, G. & Gallup, A. (1993). Health of the Planet: Results of a 1992 international environmental opinion survey of citizens in 24 nations [in English].
9. Dunlap, R.E. & Mertig, A.G. (1995). Global concern for the environment: is affluence a prerequisite? //Journal of Social Issues. (Vols. 51). No. 4. P. 121-137 [in English].
10. Dunlap, R.E. & Mertig, A.G. (1997). Global environmental concern: An anomaly for postmaterialism //Social Science Quarterly. (Vols. 78). No. 1. P. 24-29 [in English].
11. Dunlap, R.E. & York, R. (2008). The globalization of environmental concern and the limits of the postmaterialist values explanation: Evidence from four multinational surveys //The Sociological Quarterly. (Vols. 49). No. 3. P. 529-563 [in English].
12. Dunlap, R.E. (1994). International attitudes towards environment and development //Green globe yearbook of international co-operation on environment and development. P. 115-126 [in English].
13. Dunlap, R.E. (2008). The new environmental paradigm scale: From marginality to worldwide use //The Journal of environmental education. (Vols. 40). No. 1. P. 3-18 [in English].
14. Dunlap, R.E. et al. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale //Journal of social issues. (Vols. 56). No. 3. P. 425-442 [in English].
15. Duroy, Q.M. (2008). Testing the affluence hypothesis: A cross-cultural analysis of the determinants of environmental action //The Social Science Journal. (Vols. 45). No. 3. P. 419-439 [in English].
16. Franzen, A. & Meyer, R. (2009). Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000 //European sociological review. (Vols. 26). No. 2. P. 219-234 [in English].
17. Gelissen, J. (2007). Explaining popular support for environmental protection: A multilevel analysis of 50 nations //Environment and behavior. (Vols. 39). No. 3. P. 392-415 [in English].
18. Inglehart, R. (2015). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics [in English].
19. Kaplan, S. (2000). New ways to promote proenvironmental behavior: Human nature and environmentally responsible behavior //Journal of social issues. (Vols. 56). No. 3. P. 491-508 [in English].
20. Kardash, D. (2018). Ekolohichna svidomist yak umova stanovlennia ekolohichnoho suspilstva [Ecological consciousness as a condition of becoming an ecological society][in Ukrainian].
21. Knight, K.W. & Messer, B.L. (2012). Environmental concern in cross‐national perspective: the effects of affluence, environmental degradation, and World Society //Social Science Quarterly. (Vols. 93). No. 2. P. 521-537 [in English].
22. Kollmuss, A. & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? //Environmental education research. (Vols. 8). No. 3. P. 239-260 [in English].
23. Kulchytskyi, Ya.V. & Kulchytskyi, B.V. & Malinovska, M.V. (2018). Ekolohizatsiia ekonomichnykh system yak priorytet yikh transformatsii u KhKhI stolitti [Greening of economic systems as a priority for their transformation in the 21st century]. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy – Scientific Bulletin of NLTU of Ukraine, (Vols. 28), 4[in Ukrainian].
24. Lo, A.Y. (2014). Negative income effect on perception of long-term environmental risk //Ecological Economics. (Vols. 107). P. 51-58 [in English].
25. Ludwig D., Mangel M., Haddad B. (2001). Ecology, conservation, and public policy //Annual review of ecology and systematics. (Vols. 32). – No. 1. – P. 481-517 [in English].
26. Marquart-Pyatt, S.T. (2012). Contextual influences on environmental concerns cross-nationally: A multilevel investigation //Social science research. (Vols. 41). No. 5. P. 1085-1099[in English].
27. Mashnenkov, K. &Olmezov, V. (2014). Mekhanizmy formuvannia ekolohichnoi pravosvidomosti hromadian Ukrainy [Mechanisms of formation of environmental justice of Ukrainian citizens]. Publichne administruvannia: teoriia ta praktyka – Public administration: theory and practice, 1 [in Ukrainian].
28. Maslow, A.H. (1954). Motivation and Personality, Harper & Row Publishers, Inc //New York. P. 80-101[in English].
29. Ogunbode, C.A. (2013). The NEP scale: measuring ecological attitudes/worldviews in an African context //Environment, development and sustainability. (Vols. 15). – No. 6. – P. 1477-1494 [in English].
30. Shedlovska, M.V. (2011). Oznachennia ta typy ekolohichnoi svidomosti [Definitions and types of environmental consciousness]. Ukrainskyi sotsium - Ukrainian society, 2, 95-100 [in Ukrainian].
31. Sulemana, I. & James Jr, H. S. & Valdivia, C. B. (2016). Perceived socioeconomic status as a predictor of environmental concern in African and developed countries //Journal of Environmental Psychology. (Vols. 46). P. 83-95 [in English].
32. Summers, N. & VanHeuvelen, T. (2017). Heterogeneity in the relationship between country-level affluence and environmental concern //Social Forces. (Vols. 96). No. 1. P. 329-360 [in English].
33. Takahashi, B. et al. (2017). Revisiting environmental citizenship: The role of information capital and media use //Environment and Behavior. (Vols. 49). No. 2. P. 111-135 [in English].
34. Varho, O.M. (2006). Ekolohichna svidomist yak umova stanovlennia [Ecological consciousness as a condition of becoming]. Kharkiv: KhUPS im. I. Kozheduba [in Ukrainian].
35. White, P. (2009). A phenomenological exploration of ecological consciousness development //PQDT-Global [in English].
36. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro okhoronu navkolyshnoho pryrodnoho seredovyshcha» [The Law of Ukraine «On Environmental Protection»] [in Ukrainian].
37. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro Osnovni zasady (stratehiiu) derzhavnoi ekolohichnoi polityky Ukrainy na period do 2030 roku» [The Law of Ukraine «On the Fundamental Principles (Strategy) of the State Environmental Policy of Ukraine for the Period up to 2030»] [in Ukrainian].

Abstract views: 27
PDF Downloads: 11
How to Cite
Shkolnik, E., & Iholkin, S. (2020). THEFACTORS OF IMPACT ON ECOLOGICALCONSCIOUSNESSOF CITIZENS: A REVIEW OF FOREIGN LITERATURE. Public Administration and Regional Development, (7), 270-285.