Correlation of social phenomena "public space" and "state"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2020.08.01Keywords:
public sphere, public space, state, phenomenon, dialogueAbstract
The subject of the study in the article the public sphere in the theory and practice of public administration from the middle Ages to the present time. Differentiation of the public sphere are considered on the basis of the evolution of the institution of monarchy in the process of bourgeois-democratic transformations in Europe and the United States, the transition from the concept of the feudal caste of the representation of power to the bourgeois-democratic concept.
For purposeful control of the communicative processes in the sphere of interaction of state and civil society is imperative to understand the different dialogical types. The analysis of the classical liberal model of the public sphere and the public sphere in the formation of the welfare state in the twentieth century allows to reveal the role and importance of media in the development of publicity of public and state actors. The research methodology includes the use of historical and logical methods based on the study of the theory and practice of public administration to trace the formation of the public sphere, as well as identify its main elements and the relationships between them.
The main conclusions of the study are the following: the public sphere is largely dependent on the representation of power in terms of information governance and the development of mass media in the conditions of mass democracy; the power of the state assumes the functions of coordination of public space and public policy; and the consolidation of public power in a networked public space; overcoming "refeudalization" the public sphere possible through the attainment of the state and society new political compromises; public actors need to receive continued support from the community in a crisis of publicity.
References
2. Kotukov O. (2015) Teoretichni zasadi formuvannya publichnogo ta publichno-politichnogo prostoriv [Theoretical basis for the formation of public and public political spaces] Efektivnist derzhavnogo upravlinnya. Zbirnik naukovikh pracz, issue. 43, pp. 65–73.
3. Kosorukov A. A. (2017) Transformatsiia publichnoi sfery v teorii i praktytsi derzhavnoho upravlinnia [Transformation of the public sphere in the theory and practice of public administration]. Polityka i Suspilstvo, 8. – 36 S. - 47. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2017.8.20966 Retrieved from http:// https://nbpublish.tsom/library_read_artitsle.php?id=20966
4. Batalyna T.S. (2017) Analyz osobennostej formyrovanyia obschestvennoho prostranstva. Byznes y dyzajn reviu. T. 1. № 1(5). S. 11[in Russian]..
5. Vnuk-Lypynskyj E. (2012) Sotsyolohyia publychnoj zhyzny [Sociology of public life]. Moscow [in Russian].
6. Horbacheva N.B. (2014) Suschnost y soderzhanye kommunykatsyy kak sotsyokul'turnoho iavlenyia [Analysis of the features of the formation of public space]. Nauchno-metodycheskyj elektronnyj zhurnal Kontsept,7, 36-40 [in Russian].
7. Zajtsev A.V. (2014) Ynstytutsyonalyzatsyia dyaloha hosudarstva y hrazhdanskoho obschestva v kontekste normatyvnoj modely dyalohycheskoj demokratyy [Institutionalization of dialogue between the state and civil society in the context of the normative model of dialogue democracy] Sotsyodynamyka. 7, 64 - 82. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2014.7.12541 Retrieved from http: //nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=12541 [in Russian].
8. Zajtsev A.V. (2013) Publychnaia sfera kak pole dyaloha hosudarstva y hrazhdanskoho obschestva [The public sphere as a field of dialogue between the state and civil society] Vestnyk Kostromskoho hosudarstvennoho unyversyteta ym. N.A. Nekrasova, 19, 1, 203-206 [in Russian].
9. Kyn Dzh. (2001) Demokratyia y hrazhdanskoe obschestvo [Democracy and Civil Society]. (M.A. Abramov, Trans). Moscow: Prohress-Tradytsyia. [in Russian].
10. Myroshnychenko Y.V. (2014) Publychnaia polytyka kak zontychnaia kontseptsyia polytycheskoj nauky [Public policy as an umbrella concept of political science]. Hosudarstvennoe upravlenye. Elektronnyj vestnyk,47, 357 [in Russian].
11. Petrushenko L.A. ( 1997) Pryntsyp obratnoj sviazy. (Nekotorye fylosofskye y metodolohycheskye pryntsypy upravlenyia)[ Feedback principle. (Some philosophical and methodological principles of management)]. . [in Russian].
12. Sakovych E.S. (2012) Dyalektyka pryvatnosty y publychnosty v vyrtual'nom prostranstve [Dialectics of privacy and publicity in the virtual space] Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal yssledovanyj kul'tury, 3 (8), 35–41 [in Russian].
13. Smyt A. (2007)Yssledovanye o pryrode y prychynakh bohatstva narodov [Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of peoples] M.: Eksmo [in Russian].
14. Trakhtenberh A.D. (2006) Runet kak publychnaia sfera: khabermasovskyj ydeal y realnost [Runet as a public sphere: Habermas ideal and reality] POLYTEKS. – 2006, 2. Retrieved from: http:// politex.info/ content/ view/158/40/ [in Russian].
15. Khabermas Yu. (2000) Moralnoe soznanye y kommunykatyvnoe dejstvye [Moral consciousness and communicative action]. (D.V.Skliadneva,Trans). SPb. [in Russian].
16. Shabrov O.F. (1999) Polytycheskaia kybernetyka [Political Cybernetics]. Polytycheskaia entsyklopedyia. 2.Retrieved from http://shabrov.mfo/Statji/pol_kib.htm [in Russian].
17. Shmytter F. (1996) Razmyshlenyia o hrazhdanskom obschestve y konsolydatsyy demokratyy [Reflections on civil society and the consolidation of democracy]. Polys. 5 [in Russian].
18. Yarskaya-Smirnova E.R., Romanov P.V. (2013) Publichnaya sfera: programma issledovaniya / Publichnaya sfera: teoriya, metodologiya, keis stadi: kollektiv. monogr. / pod red. E.R. Yarskoi-Smirnovoi i P.V. Romanova (Biblioteka «Zhurnala issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki») [in Russian].
19. Barber B. (1984) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. – Berkeley: University of California Press, Ltd. London, England, [in English].
20. Barber В. (1997) Démocratie forte / Benjamin R. – Desclée de Brouwer [in English].
21. Demokratie braucht den öffentlichen Raum Retrieved from https://www.austriandemocracylab.at/demokratie-braucht-den-oeffentlichen-raum/ [in English].
22. Habermas L(2015).: democracy and the public sphere. Pluto Press, 2005. Retrieved from https://uniteyouthdublin.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/ebooksclub-org__jurgen_habermas__democracy_and_the_public_sphere__modern_european_thinkers_.pdf [in English].
23. Walton D. (1992) Types of Dialogue, Dialectical Shifts and Fallacies // Argumentation Illuminated. F. H. van Eemeren wt al. (eds.). Amsterdam. [in English].
.png)
.png)
