Readiness for management in crisis situations in the sphere of public administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2023.22.05Keywords:
readiness for management, crisis situation, public management, components of the phenomenon of readiness.Abstract
The article examines the phenomenon of readiness to manage in crisis situations in the field of public administration. The multifacetedness of this concept is emphasized, which is manifested in the combination of approaches to the study of the activation of its potential both in the conditions of a certain situation (crisis conditions) and in the conditions of a certain activity (public administration). It is noted that a crisis situation is a situation of human activity, and therefore a condition for realizing readiness for management. The definition of preparedness for management in crisis situations in the field of public administration is given as the level of preparation and ability of public servants to effectively respond to unforeseen and extraordinary circumstances that may arise in the course of their professional activities. It is noted that when studying the readiness for management, we study the potential of the internal resources of the individual, the activation and implementation of which are facilitated by the developed components of readiness: motivational and valuable; personal; cognitive; activity; reflexive; creative It is noted that the implementation of readiness for management involves overcoming the barrier between the actual and potential resources of the individual. It is emphasized that the readiness to manage complex social systems in crisis situations is correlated with the readiness for changes in these systems. Four systemic components of the phenomenon of readiness to manage in the field of public management in crisis situations were studied: situational, subject (reactive), organizational-professional and effective. It was concluded that the readiness of public servants to manage in crisis situations expresses the general orientation of the subject of management to a certain activity, reflecting his active and creative relationship to the surrounding reality and to himself.
References
Akimov, O.O. (2022). Profesiina diialnist derzhavnykh sluzhbovtsiv v umovakh yevrointehratsii Ukrainy: pytannia formuvannia psykholohichnoi hotovnosti [Professional activities of civil servants in the conditions of European integration of Ukraine: the issue of psychological readiness]. Center of educational literature. Kyiv. Retrieved from: https://knushop.com.ua/ books?product_id=1764 [in Ukrainian].
Balahur, L.O., & Didenko, O.V. (2014). Sutnist, zmist i struktura hotovnosti maibutnikh ofitseriv-prykordonnykiv do upravlinnia osnovnymy pidrozdilamy okhorony derzhavnoho kordonu [The essence, content and structure of the readiness of future border officers to manage the main units of state border protection]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu – Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University, 32, (pp. 15-17). Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nvuuped_2014_32_5 [in Ukrainian].
Barchi, B.V. (2016). Profesiina «hotovnist» u strukturi profesiinoi diialnosti psykholoha [Professional "readiness" in the structure of a psychologist's professional activity]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii. Psykholohiia tvorchosti – Actual problems of psychology. Psychology of creativity, (Vols. 12), 22, (pp. 21-30) [in Ukrainian].
Chernenko, N.M. (2016). Pidhotovka maibutnikh menedzheriv osvity do upravlinnia ryzykamy: teoriia i praktyka [Training future managers of education in risk management: theory and practice]. Odesa [in Ukrainian].
Diachenko, M., & Kandybovych, L. (1978). Psykholohycheskye problemy hotovnosty k deiatelnosty [Psychological problems of readiness for activity]. Mynsk. BHU [in Ukrainian].
Izha, M.M., & Kurnosenko, L.V. (2023). Publichne upravlinnia v umovakh vyklykiv voiennoho stanu [Public administration under martial law challenges]. Public administration and regional development, 19, (pp. 10-29). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2023.19.01 [in Ukrainian].
Kharahirlo, V.Ye. (2018). Sutnist i struktura hotovnosti do innovatsiinoi diialnosti pedahohichnykh pratsivnykiv zakladiv profesiino-tekhnichnoi osvity [The essence and structure of readiness for innovative activity of pedagogical workers of vocational and technical education institutions]. Profesiina osvita – Professional education, 1, (pp. 34-38) [in Ukrainian].
Kolosovych, O.S. (2015). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti hotovnosti suchasnykh kerivnykiv do efektyvnoi upravlinskoi diialnosti [Psychological features of the readiness of modern managers for effective managerial activity]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav – Scientific Bulletin of the Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, 1, (pp. 90-99) [in Ukrainian].
Lahad, M., & Ben-Nesher, U. (2008). Community coping: Resilience models for preparation, intervention and rehabilitation in manmade and natural disasters. Phoenix of Natural Disasters: Community Resilience, (pp. 195-208) [in English].
Lebid, O.V. (2018). Struktura hotovnosti maibutnoho kerivnyka zahalnoosvitnoho navchalnoho zakladu do stratehichnoho upravlinnia [The structure of readiness of the future head of a comprehensive educational institution for strategic management]. Visnyk Universytetu Alfreda Nobelia – Bulletin of Alfred Nobel University, 1 (15), (pp. 259-266). Retrieved from: DOI 10.32342/2522-41-5-2018-0-15-259-266 [in Ukrainian].
Maksymenko, S.D. (2016). Osobystist, yak subiekt podolannia kryzovykh staniv. [Personality as a subject of overcoming crisis situations]. Materialy metodychnoho seminaru NAN Ukrainy «Osobystist v umovakh suchasnykh kryzovykh vyklykiv» – Materials of the methodical seminar of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine «Personality in the conditions of modern crisis challenges», (pp. 8-13) [in Ukrainian].
Masyk, M. (2022). Instytutsionalna stiikist publichnoho upravlinnia v umovakh viiny.[ Institutional stability of public administration in war conditions]. Naukovi perspektyvy – Scientific perspectives, 12(30), (pp. 41-54). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2022-12(30)-41-54 [in Ukrainian].
Melnychenko, A.A., & Shabash, I.R. (2023). Profesiina hotovnist derzhavnykh sluzhbovtsiv do diialnosti v umovakh tsyfrovoi transformatsii upravlinskykh vidnosyn [Professional readiness of civil servants for activities in the conditions of digital transformation of management relations]. Ekspert: paradyhmy yurydychnykh nauk i derzhavnoho upravlinnia – Expert: paradigms of legal sciences and public administration, 4(22), (pp. 156-172). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/ 10.32689/2617-9660-2022-4(22)-156-172 [in Ukrainian].
Moos, R., & Billings, A. (1982). Conceptualizing and Measuring Coping Resources and Processes. In Handbook of Stress: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects, (pp. 212-230). L. Goldberger, & Sh. Breznitz (Eds.). New York: Free Press [in English].
Orel, M.H. (2018). Aksiolohichnyi aspekt kontseptu «stiikist derzhavy» u konteksti funktsii publichnoho upravlinnia [Axiological aspect of the concept of «state stability» in the context of public administration functions]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid – Investments: practice and experience, 24, (pp. 95-101). Retrieved from: http://www.investplan.com.ua/pdf/24_2018/ 19.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Pohrebniak, Y. (2013). Hotovnist derzhavnykh sluzhbovtsiv do upravlinnia sotsialnymy proektamy: strukturno-funktsionalnyi analiz. [Readiness of civil servants to manage social projects: structural and functional analysis]. Publichne upravlinnia ta mistseve samovriaduvannia – State administration and local self-government, (Vol. 2), (17), (pp. 202-209) [in Ukrainian].
Rybnikov, S.R. (2011). Formuvannia hotovnosti maibutnikh ekolohiv do profesiino oriientovanoi upravlinskoi diialnosti [Formation of readiness of future ecologists for professionally oriented managerial activities]. Luhansk: State institution «Luhansk National University named after Taras Shevchenko» [in Ukrainian].
Rodina, N. (2011). Psykholohiia kopinh-povedinky: systemne modeliuvannia [Psychology of coping behavior: systematic modeling]. Odesa [in Ukrainian].
Sazonova, T.O., & Ostashova, V.O. (2016). Formuvannia profesiinoi hotovnosti personalu do realizatsii proektiv ta yikh pravove samovykhovannia [Formation of professional readiness of personnel to implement projects and their legal self-education]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu – Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University, 17(3), (pp. 78-81) [in Ukrainian].
Tkachyshyna, O.R. (2020). Kryzovi sytuatsii: adaptatsiini resursy osobystosti ta sotsialni stereotypy [Crisis situations: adaptive resources of the individual and social stereotypes]. Teoriia i praktyka suchasnoi psykholohii – Theory and practice of modern psychology, 1, (Vols. 3), (pp. 116-120). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.32840/2663-6026.2020.1-3.20 [in Ukrainian].
.png)
.png)
