INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATIONS IN THE DIRECTION OF INCREASING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE STATE POLICY OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2024.23.02Keywords:
critical infrastructure, state policy, institutional transformations, sustainability, resilience.Abstract
The article analyzes modern features of state policy in the field of critical infrastructure protection. Attention is focused on the need for institutional transformations in the direction of improving efficiency, transparency, responsibility and responding to new security challenges in the conditions of a hybrid war with the Russian Federation.
The practice of protecting critical infrastructure facilities in developed countries has been studied. It was determined that its priority is the actualization of the predicate of stability of critical infrastructure objects. The content of normative and legal acts of Ukraine in this area was analyzed. A number of provisions have been identified that allow the adjustment of the domestic security doctrine to the European vector of stability.
Within the perspective of the development of the concept of sustainability, the intention of «critical infrastructure stakeholders» is substantiated. This opens up the prospects of creating transparent conditions for ensuring the annihilation of state institutions of power, state protection systems, the private sector, educational and scientific institutions and other stakeholders of critical infrastructure to the National System of Critical Infrastructure Protection at the next levels of management. The possible levels of such cooperation are determined.
Modern scientific works were analyzed, which studied the prospects of changing the paradigm of protection and stability to the paradigm of resilience. The complex of institutional transformations is proposed to be expanded due to the application within the framework of the functioning of the National Critical Infrastructure Protection System of the process of determining and analyzing the range of risks that the country faces in the spheres of critical infrastructure functioning. The transformation of institutional protection systems is considered through the prism of systemic determinants, among which physical protection and defense, cyber protection and defense, preventive measures of protection and defense, and an educational and scientific approach are highlighted.
The system of organization at the state level of conducting regular interdisciplinary trainings on the operational response to emergency situations at facilities has been studied. It is proposed to increase clarity in the delineation of responsibility for project threats and to strengthen control over compliance with the systematicity of interdisciplinary training. On the basis of the extrapolations of scientists' hypotheses and the results of the author's research, a proposal was made to systematize the main proposals for institutional transformations in the direction of increasing the effectiveness of the state policy for the protection of critical infrastructure in the form of a Preventive concept of resilience of critical infrastructure objects.
References
2. Holtsov, A.H. (2023). Heostratehiia Ukrainy shchodo Rosiiskoi Federatsii [Geostrategy of Ukraine in relation to the Russian Federation]. Visnyk NTUU «KPI». Politolohiia. Sotsiolohiia. Pravo – National Technical University of Ukraine Journal. Political science. Sociology. Law, 1 (57), (pp. 71-77) [in Ukrainian].
3. Zubko, H.Yu. (2020). Derzhavna infrastrukturna polityka Ukrainy: administratyvno-pravovi zasady rehuliuvannia [State infrastructure policy of Ukraine: administrative and legal principles of regulation]. Kherson: Vydavnychyi dim «Helvetyka» [in Ukrainian].
4. Zakon Ukrainy Pro krytychnu infrastrukturu: pryiniatyi 16 list 2021 roku No. 1882-IX [Law of Ukraine On Critical Infrastructure from 16 November 2021, No. 1882-IX]. (n.d.). zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1882-20 [in Ukrainian].
5. Kondratov, S.I., & Sukhodolia, O.M. (2020). Derzhavna systema zakhystu krytychnoi infrastruktury v systemi zabezpechennia natsionalnoi bezpeky [State system of protection of critical infrastructure in the system of ensuring national security]. Kyiv: NISD [in Ukrainian].
6. Sait Uriadu Velykobrytanii [Site of UK Government]. www.gov.uk. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk [in Ukrainian].
7. Pyrozhkov, S.I., Bozhok, Ye.V. & Khamitov, N.V. (2021). Natsionalna stiikist (rezylientnist) krainy: stratehiia i taktyka vyperedzhennia hibrydnykh zahroz [National stability (resilience) of the country: strategy and tactics of anticipating hybrid threats]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy – Visnyk of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 8, (pp. 74-82) [in Ukrainian].
8. Pyrozhkov, S.I. & Khamitov, N.V. (2016). Tsyvilizatsiinyi proekt Ukrainy: vid ambitsii do realnykh mozhlyvostei [Civilization project of Ukraine: from ambitions to real possibilities]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy – Visnyk of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 6, (pp. 45-52) [in Ukrainian].
9. Postanova KMU Poriadok provedennia monitorynhu rivnia bezpeky obiektiv krytychnoi infrastruktury pryiniata 22 sich 2022 roku. No. 821 [Resolution of the CMU Procedure for monitoring the security level of critical infrastructure objects from 22 January No. 821]. (n.d.). zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/821-2022-p#Text [in Ukrainian].
10. Reznikova, O.O. (2022). Natsionalna stiikist v umovakh minlyvoho bezpekovoho seredovyshcha [National stability in the conditions of a changing security environment]. Kyiv: NISD [in Ukrainian].
11. Mokhor, V.V., & Korobeinikov, F.O. (2023). Vtilennia paradyhmy rezylientnosti v zabezpechennia funktsionuvannia krytychnoi infrastruktury YeS [Implementation of the paradigm of resilience in ensuring the functioning of the critical infrastructure of the EU]. Rezylientnist krytychnoi infrastruktury – 2023: zbirnyk materialiv naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii – Critical Infrastructure Resilience – 2023: collection of materials of the scientific and practical conference, (pp. 48-52). Kyiv: PIMEE of NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
12. Strakhnitskyi, Ya.O. (2022). Osoblyvosti derzhavnoi polityky zakhystu krytychnoi infrastruktury v Ukraini ta napriamy yii udoskonalennia v umovakh viiny [Peculiarities of the state policy of critical infrastructure protection in Ukraine and directions for its improvement in wartime conditions]. Knowledge, Education, Law, Management, 7 (51), (pp. 104-111) [in Ukrainian].
13. Strakhnitskyi, Ya.O. (2022). Strukturno-funktsionalna kharakterystyka derzhavnoi polityky u sferi zakhystu krytychnoi infrastruktury v Ukraini [Structural and functional characteristics of state policy in the sphere of critical infrastructure protection in Ukraine]. Publichne upravlinnia ta mytne administruvannia – Public administration and customs administration, 4 (35), (pp. 112-117) [in Ukrainian].
14. Sukhodolia, O.M. (2018). Stiikist enerhetychnoi systemy chy stiikist enerhozabezpechennia spozhyvachiv: postanovka problem [Sustainability of the energy system or sustainability of energy supply to consumers: problem statement]. Stratehichni priorytety – Strategic priorities, 2, (pp. 101-117) [in Ukrainian].
15. Suhodolya, O.M. (2023). Nova Dyrektyva YeS shchodo stiikosti krytychnoi infrastruktury (CER Directive) [The new EU Directive on the sustainability of critical infrastructure (CER Directive)]. Kyiv: NISD. Retrieved from https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2023-04/az_eu-cer_12042023.pdf [in Ukrainian].
16. Sait Electricity Information Sharing and Analysis Center [Site of Electricity Information Sharing and Analysis Center]. www.eisac.com. Retrieved from: https://www.eisac.com/ [in English].
17. Josse, E., Dubois, V. (2009). Interventions humanitaires en santé mentale dans les violences de masse, (1st edition). Bruxelles: Groupe De Boeck, 301 [in English].
18. National Infrastructure Protection Plan – NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience. (n.d.). www.cisa.gov. Retrieved from https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-11/national-infrastructure-protection-plan-2013-508.pdf [in English].
19. National Risk Assessments: A Cross Country Perspective The evolving practice of National Risk Assessments in OECD countries. (n.d.). read.oecd-ilibrary.org. Retrieved from https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/national-risk-assessments/the-evolving-practice-of-national-risk-assessments-in-oecd-countries_9789264287532-3-en#page1 [in English].
20. Trucco, P., Cagno, E., & Ambroggi, M.De. (2012). Dynamic functionalmodelling of vulnerability and interoperability of Critical Infrastructures. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 105, (pp. 51-63) [in English].
21. Williamson, R.D., & Morris, J.C. (2021). Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic for Federalism and Infrastructure: A Call to Action. Public Works Management and Policy, 5, (pp. 6-12) [in English].
22. Fekete, A., Rhuner, J. (2020). Sustainable Digital Transformation of Disaster Risk-Integrating New Types of Digital Social Vulnerability and Interdependencies with Critical Infrastructure. Sustainability, 12(22), (pp. 1-18) [in English].
.png)
.png)
