CONCEPT OF CRISIS IN SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2024.25.06Keywords:
crisis, risk, threat, danger, strategic risk, uncertaintyAbstract
The article examines the main approaches to the concept and content of crisis in scientific literature. The main trends in the development of the crisis and its contradictions are analyzed. It is emphasized that most crises and their understanding are the result of a combination of human errors, institutional «failures» and constant changes in the sphere of functioning of society and states. The main stages of the development of theoretical approaches regarding the concept and content of the crisis and its main derivatives are considered. It has been proven that he does not have a clear understanding of the concept and essence of the crisis; there are three main approaches to understanding the concept and content of crisis; there are several stages of development and formation of the concept and content of the crisis; for the most part, researchers give this phenomenon a positive or negative character. This is explained by the complex nature of these phenomena and insufficient attention for a long time.
It is indicated that analyzing the existing definitions of the concept of «crisis», we can talk about three main approaches: a crisis is a stage of the life cycle of any system, that is, a form of its development; crisis is a turning point in the functioning of the system, which provokes any changes, regardless of the result; a crisis is a deterioration of one or more parameters of the system's functioning, which can even lead to its final disappearance. It is emphasized that the crisis is not a separate phenomenon, but a process unfolding as various factors and forces interact in an unpredictable manner; disruption of the usual daily rhythm of life; the emergence and increase of anxiety and stress in the population; potential and real threats to basic values and structural social systems. It has been proven that all views on the concept and meaning of «crisis» and related concepts are determined by the established framework of their interpretation, as well as by the theoretical and spatiotemporal relationship in which they are interpreted. The conducted research shows that in modern scientific literature there are many approaches to understanding the concepts of crisis and risk, sometimes they are even opposite to each other.
In this regard, it is appropriate to generalize the existing approaches to these concepts. This will provide an opportunity to more comprehensively reveal the essence of the concepts and will help during the formation of crisis and risk management policy. The modern world is quite complex and dynamic, which leads to the appearance of an increasing number of various crises and risks. Only a thorough understanding and perception of the crisis will allow, if not to avoid them, then to get out of them with the least losses.
References
Velykanova, M.M. (2017). Poniattia ta strukturni elementy ryzyku: tsyvilno-pravovyi aspekt [Concept and structural elements of risk: civil-legal aspect]. Universytetski naukovi zapysky – University scientific notes, 3. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Unzap_2017_3_9 [in Ukrainian].
Hrynchyshyn, Ya.M. (2014). Osnovni pidkhody do vyznachennia poniattia «kryza pidpryiemstva» [Basic approaches to defining the concept of «enterprise crisis»]. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy – Scientific Bulletin of National Technical University of Ukraine, 24 (4), (pp. 277-283) [in Ukrainian].
Kutashenko, M.V. (2009). Sutnist ryzyku i prychyny yoho vynyknennia [The essence of risk and its causes]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid – Investments: practice and experience, 6. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ipd_2009_6_13 [in Ukrainian].
Stratehichnyi ryzyk. Narizhnyi kamin transformatsii ryzykiv [Strategic risk. The cornerstone of risk transformation]. (2023). (n.d.). www2.deloitte.com. Retrieved from: https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/risk/articles/implementing-risk-transformation-in-organizations.html [in Ukrainian].
Tlumachnyi slovnyk [Dictionary]. (2020). (n.d.). lcorp.ulif.org.ua. Retrieved from: http://lcorp.ulif.org.ua/dictua/ [in Ukrainian].
Yakos, I.S. (2023). Ryzyk yak mira nevyznachenosti [Risk as a measure of uncertainty]. Retrieved from: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/haYakos.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Barton, A.H. (1969). Communities in disaster: A sociological analysis of collective stress situations. New York, Doubleday [in English].
Barton, L. (1993). Crisis in organizations: Managing and communicating in the Heat of Chaos. Ohio: SouthWestern [in English].
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Toward a new modernity. London, Sage [in English].
Erikson, E.H. (1994). Identity and the Life Cycle. New York: W.W. Norton & Company [in English].
Flanagan, S., & Almond, G. (1973). Models and Methods of Analysis. Crisis, Choice and Change, (pp. 43-102). Boston [in English].
Giddens, A. (2000). Jedinečný svět: Jak globalizace mění náš život. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství [in Czech].
Green, P. (1994). Winning PR Tactics: Effective Techniques to Boost Your Sales. Financial Times Prentice Hall [in English].
Grenz, T. (1987). Deminsionen und Typen der Unternehmenskrise. Frankfurt am Main [in English].
Hewitt, K. (Ed.). (1983). Interpretations of calamity: From the viewpoint of human ecology. Boston, Allen and Unwin [in English].
Knight, F. (1991). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston, Houghton Miffin Company [in English].
Koselleck, R. (1992). «Některé otázky spojené s historií pojmu «krize». In: Pojem krize v dnešním myšlení, (pp. 47-57). Praha: Filosofický ústav ČSAV [in Czech].
Luhmann, N. (1991). Sociologie des Risicos. Berlin, New York, Walter de Gruyter [in English].
Quarantelli, E.L. (1996). The future is not the past repeated: Projecting disasters in the 21st century from current trends. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, (Vol. 4), 4, (pp. 228-240) [in English].
Raphael, B. (1986). When disaster strikes: A handbook for the caring professions. London, Unwin Hyman [in English].
Rosenthal, U., & Pijnenburg, B. (1991). «Simulation – oriented scenarios». Crisis Management and Decision Making: Simulation Oriented Scenarios, 3. Dordrecht: Kluwer [in English].
Rosenthal, U., & Quarantelli, E.L. (1998). Future disasters, future definitions. What is a disaster? Perspectives of the question, (pp. 146-160). London, Routledge [in English].
Rosenthal, U., Charles, M., & t’Hart, P. (Eds.). (1989). Coping with crises: The management of disasters, riots and terrorism. Springfield, Charles C. Thomas [in English].
Svensson, P. (1986). Stability, Crisis and Breakdown: Some Notes on the Concept of Crisis in Political Analysis. Scandinavian Political Studies, (Vol. 9), 2, (pp. 129-139) [in English].
Valackiene, A. (2011) Theoretical Substation of the Model for Crisis Management in Organization. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 22(1), (pp. 78-90) [in English].
Websster, M. (1828). Crisis. Dictionary. www.merriamwebster.com. Retrieved from: https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/crisis [in English].
Nazarenko, O., Bazyka, S., & Shtyrov, O. (2024). Upravlinnia zminamy yak vazhlyva antykryzova komponenta rozvytku publichnoho upravlinnia. [Change management as an important anti-crisis component of the development of public administration]. Publichne upravlinnia ta rehionalnyi rozvytok – Public Administration and Regional Development, (24), (pp. 589-609). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2024.24.12 [in Ukrainian].
张文霞, 赵延东 (2011). 风险社会:概念的提出及研究进展. 科学与社会, 1(2), (pp. 53-63) [in Chinese].
赵延东 (2007). 解读风险社会. 自然辩证法研究, 6, (pp. 81-83) [in Chinese]
陈磊 (2005). 风险社会理论与和谐社会建设. 南京社会科学, 2, (pp. 43-48) [in Chinese].









.png)






.png)


















