METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND ASSESSING ITS OUTCOMES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2026.32.12Keywords:
public administration, digital transformation, digitalization, digital governance, performance evaluationAbstract
The article examines the methodological foundations for measuring the digital transformation of public administration and assessing its outcomes under conditions of governance digitalization. It is substantiated that the integration of digital technologies into public authorities requires comprehensive approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of digital change. Digital transformation is interpreted as a multidimensional process encompassing the modernization of administrative procedures, the development of e-government, the expansion of digital services, and the strengthening of institutional capacity. Key assessment dimensions are identified, including strategic planning, level of digital integration, cybersecurity, administrative efficiency, accessibility of digital services, and digital competencies of public servants. Particular attention is paid to citizen feedback and public trust as indicators of effectiveness. It is established that digitalization contributes to increased transparency, optimization of administrative processes, improved service delivery, and institutional resilience. International approaches to assessing digital transformation, including the Network Readiness Index (NRI), the E-Government Development Index (EGDI), and the Global Innovation Index (GII), are analyzed as tools for comparative evaluation of countries. At the same time, their limitations in capturing service quality and citizen satisfaction are emphasized. The need for a comprehensive evaluation system combining quantitative and qualitative indicators is justified. It is proposed to consider not only technological parameters but also institutional outcomes, social inclusiveness, and impacts on governance quality. Directions for improving the monitoring system of digital transformation based on international standards and national priorities are outlined.
References
Australian Government. (n.d.). Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) [Official website]. Retrieved from: https://www.dta.gov.au/ [in English].
Cabinet Office. (n.d.). Measuring success: Service manual. GOV.UK. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/measuring-success [in English].
Contreras-Yupanqui, B. S. (2025). Impact of digital transformation on the productivity of public administration [Impact of digital transformation on the productivity of public administration]. Management (Montevideo), 3, Article 224. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.62486/agma2025224 [in English].
Fedorov, M. (2025). Zbilshyly efektyvnist u 10 raziv. Yak Mintsyfra perekhodyt na systemu OKR [Increased efficiency tenfold: How the Ministry of Digital Transformation transitions to the OKR system]. AIN.UA. Retrieved from: https://ain.ua/2025/01/24/okr-kolonka-mixaila-fedorova/ [in Ukrainian].
Krejnus, M., Štofková, K. R., Štofková, J., Štofková, Z., Loučanová, E., Poliaková, A., & Šujanská, L. (2024). Measuring efficiency and satisfaction in the context of digital transformation [Measuring efficiency and satisfaction in the context of digital transformation]. Administrative Sciences, 14(9), Article 217. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14090217 [in English].
Maniam, A. (2020). How can we measure and rank digital government successes? GovInsider. Retrieved from: https://govinsider.asia/intl-en/article/what-digital-gov-success-looks-looks-like [in English].
Ministerstvo tsyfrovoi transformatsii Ukrainy. (2026). Indeks tsyfrovoi transformatsii rehioniv Ukrainy: pidsumky 2025 roku [Digital Transformation Index of the Regions of Ukraine: Results of 2025]. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Neseniuk, A. (2024). Shcho take OKR i yak tse zaprovadyty: dosvid Mintsyfry Fedorova [What OKR is and how to implement it: the experience of the Ministry of Digital Transformation]. Forbes Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://forbes.ua/innovations/ideya-zaraziti-derzhavni-institutsii-pravilnim-virusom-mintsifri-vikoristovue-metod-okr-dlya-bilshoi-efektivnosti-roboti-yak-tse-dopomagae-ekonomiti-chas-ta-vprovadzhuvati-shi-26112024-25063 [in Ukrainian].
Petrenko, N. O., & Polishchuk, O. A. (2019). Methodological aspects of evaluating the effectiveness of public administration based on the implementation of digitalization. Public Administration and Regional Development Journal, 4, 180–190. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.32840/pdu.2019.4.22 [in Ukrainian].
Pustovarov, A. I. (2020). Analysis of indicators of digital transformation of the national economy based on international indices. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Mizhnarodni ekonomichni vidnosyny ta svitove hospodarstvo – Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: International Economic Relations and World Economy, (30), 243–249. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.32782/2413-9971/2020-30-46 [in Ukrainian].
Syrotin, V. D. (2023). Features of digitalization in the field of public administration. Problemy suchasnykh transformatsii. Seriia: pravo, publichne upravlinnia ta administruvannia – Problems of modern transformations. Series: law, public administration and administration, 9. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.54929/2786-5746-2023-9-02-06 [in Ukrainian].
United Nations. (2024). E-Government Development Index: Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/id/180-Ukraine [in English].
U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (n.d.). USA Performance. Retrieved from: https://www.opm.gov/services-for-agencies/talent-systems/usa-performance/ [in English].
Roekel Van, H., Branderhorst, M., Tummers, L., & Meijer, A. (2025). Digital transformation leadership: A public value-centered measurement scale. Government Information Quarterly, 42(4), Article 102091. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102091 [in English].
Westermann, H., Regev, G., & others. (2017). Measuring digital government: How to assess and compare digitalisation in public sector organisations. In Digital Government (pp. 25–38). Springer. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38795-6_2 [in English].
World Economic Forum. (2025). Network Readiness Index: Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://networkreadinessindex.org/country/ukraine/ [in English].
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2025). Global Innovation Index: Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://www.wipo.int/gii-ranking/en/ukraine [in English].









.png)






.png)


















