The European experience of the formation of the legal mechanism of state administration in the sphere of legal protection trademarks: problems and prospects of implementation in Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2022.17.08Keywords:
public administration, legal mechanism trademark, intellectual property, experienceAbstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the European experience in the formation of the legal mechanism of public administration in the field of protection and protection of trademarks. In particular, the peculiarities of legal protection of trademarks in Italy, Portugal, Switzerland, France and other countries of the European Union were studied and analyzed. Particular attention is paid to the protection of territorial marks and their correlation with well-known marks. It was determined that the formation of European standards for the protection and protection of trademarks in the European Union was determined by the processes of globalization and integration. The article draws attention to the need to further prepare Ukraine for membership in the European Union by completing a comprehensive transformation of all spheres. One of these areas is the sphere of intellectual property, in particular, but not exclusively, in relation to issues of legal protection and protection of trademarks. The transformation of the sphere of legal protection and protection of intellectual property objects is an important and necessary element of the free exchange of goods and services and the economic development and prosperity of Ukraine. Based on the conducted research, the author identified the main directions, the development of which will allow to increase the level of legal protection and protection of trademarks in Ukraine due to the improvement of the legal mechanism of state management in the field of intellectual property. It has been established that the further improvement of the legislative climate in the field of intellectual property in Ukraine is a necessary condition for its international integration.
References
2. Paryzka konventsiia pro okhoronu promyslovoi vlasnosti [Paris Convention on the Protection of Industrial Property]. (n.d.). zakon.rada.gov.ua Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_123#Text [in Ukrainian]
3. Kodeks promyslovoi vlasnosti Italii [Code of Industrial Property of Italy]. (n.d.). wipolex.wipo.int. Retrieved from https://wipolex.wipo.int/ru/text/229338 [in Italian]
4. Kodeks promyslovoi vlasnosti Portuhalii [Industrial Property Code of Portugal]. (n.d.). wipolex.wipo.int. Retrieved from https://wipolex.wipo.int/ru/text/181706 [in English]
5. Sudova praktyka Sudu Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu u sferi intelektualnoi vlasnosti (2016) [Court practice of the Court of the European Union in the field of intellectual property]. (n.d.). businesslaw.org.ua. Retrieved from https://www.businesslaw.org.ua/wp-content/Intel_prop_book_web.pdf [in Ukrainian]
6. Kodeks intelektualnoi vlasnosti Frantsii [French Intellectual Property Code]. (n.d.). wipolex.wipo.int. Retrieved from https://wipolex.wipo.int/ru/text/540660 [in French]
7. Michael Hawkins and Dr Tobias Dolde (2019). Trademark rights and protection in the European Union. (n.d.). lexology.com. Retrieved from https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=d57-65864-fb9b-4b39-8f61-5df0cde562f5 [in English]
8. Rehlament Yevropeiskoho Parlamentu i Rady (IeS) 2019/1020 [Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU) 2019/1020]. (n.d.). zakon.rada.gov.ua Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_012-19#Text [in Ukrainian]
9. Istorychni tovarni znaky, shcho stanovliat natsionalnyi interes, reiestr ta zakhyst u «dekreti pro zrostannia» ["Historical trademarks of national interest, register and protections in the «growth decree"]. (n.d.). greatitalianfoodtrade.it. Retrieved from https://www.greatitalianfoodtrade.it/en/mercati/marchi-storici-di-interesse-nazionale-registro-e-tutele-nel-decreto-crescita/ [in English]
10. Federalnyi zakon Shveitsarii «Pro okhoronu shveitsarskoho herba ta inshykh derzhavnykh symvoliv» [Swiss Federal Law "On the Protection of the Swiss Coat of Arms and Other State Symbols"]. (n.d.). wipolex.wipo.int. Retrieved from https://wipolex.wipo.int/ru/text/435392 [in English]
11. Federalnyi zakon Shveitsarii «Pro zakhyst tovarnykh znakiv» [Swiss Federal Law "On the Protection of Trademarks"]. (n.d.). wipolex.wipo.int. Retrieved from https://wipolex.wipo.int/ru/text/584820 [in French]
12. Selmon P. (2010) Korotkyi dovidnyk z ukladannia mizhnarodnykh uhod u sferi prav intelektualnoi vlasnosti [A short guide to concluding international agreements in the field of intellectual property rights]. libinnovate.files.wordpress.com. Retrieved from: http://libinnovate.files.wordpress.com/ 2010/02/intellectual_rights_ukr1.pdf. [in Ukrainian]
13. Kapitsa Yu. (2006) Stan ta napriamy adaptatsii zakonodavstva Ukrainy u sferi okhorony intelektualnoi vlasnosti do zakonodavstva YeS [Status and directions of adaptation of the legislation of Ukraine in the field of intellectual property protection to the EU]. www.yur-gazeta.com. Retrieved from: http://www.yur-gazeta.com/oarticle/2153/. [in Ukrainian]
14. Volik V., Diachenko S, Sokorynskyi Iur., Yemelyanov V., Ryabovol L. Patent Trolling as Problem of Intellectual Property Rights // Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues. 2019. Volume 22, Special Issue 2. Retrieved from: https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Patent-trolling-as-problem-of-intellectual-property-rights-1544-0044-22-SI-2-364.pdf [in English]
.png)
.png)
