Brand positioning of the university as strategic guidelines for integration in the international educational space
Keywords:
European higher education space, international ratings, university branding; strategic development benchmarks of higher education, system of rating evaluation, evaluation indices of higher educational institutions’ activity, STEPS model, field-specific evaluation index
Abstract
The article highlights the issue of ranking evaluation of universities, which is an indicator of their academic reputation in the context of integration into the international and European space of higher education. Conceptual principles and methodological approaches regarding the rating evaluation of the results of higher education institutions and their improvement, as well as the forms and means of branding and positioning of universities were substantiated.
It is noted that the proper positioning of leading Ukrainian universities in global rankings and their promotion to international performance evaluation systems will open up additional opportunities for graduates of competitive educational programs to implement acquired competencies, and for scientific and pedagogical staff to demonstrate professional knowledge on the international labor market.
Emphasis is placed on the use of a specific indicator, namely the sectoral Index of the evaluation of the activities of higher education institutions, which can be a universal indicator for evaluating the quality of educational activities in the field of higher education within a certain field of knowledge.
The introduction of specific branch and subject indicators for evaluating the activities of higher education institutions will provide an opportunity to optimize the evaluation system and improve the quality of the university's positioning, bringing it closer to the appropriate target audience.
The key integrative components of proactive branding of universities have been determined, which must be ensured in the target categories of stakeholders, based on the key areas of optimization, among which it is proposed to identify as priority three integration components of branding and positioning of the university, namely web resources, place of stakeholders, processes of internationalization.
References
1. Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU). www.shanghairanking.com Retrieved from http://www.shanghairanking.com/ [in English].
2. Aguillo, I.F. (Ed.). (2022). Methodology. www.webometrics.info. Retrieved from https://www.webometrics.info/en/Methodology [in English].
3. Aguillo, I.F., Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Ortega, J.L. (2010). Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics, 85(1), 243-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0190-z [in English].
4. Akademichnyi reitynh zakladiv vyshchoi osvity Ukrainy «Top-200 Ukraina 2022» [Academic rating of higher education institutions of Ukraine «Top-200 Ukraine 2022»]. www.euroosvita.net. Retrieved from http://www.euroosvita.net/ [in Ukrainian].
5. Berlin Principles of Ranking of Higher Education Institutions. The Proceedings of 2nd Meeting of the International Rankings Expert Group (IREG): «Methodology and Quality Standards of Rankings». euroosvita.net. Retrieved from http://euroosvita.net/prog/data/doc/BerlinPrinciples.pdf [in English].
6. Bottani, N. (1998). The OECD Educational Indicators: purposes, limits and production processes. Prospects, 18(1), 61-75 [in English].
7. Butler, D. (2010). University rankings smarten up. Nature, 464(7285), 16-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/464016a [in English].
8. Cherepovska, T.V., I. Parubchak, I.O., & Karamyshev D.V. (2021). Higher Education Management System Based on Principles of Strategic Development. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(14), 31-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i14.4806 [in English].
9. Chernetskyi, Yu. (n.d.). Vyshcha tekhnichna osvita – u hlobalno-reitynhovomu vymiri [Higher technical education - in the global rating dimension]. newssky.com.ua. Retrieved from https://newssky.com.ua/vishha-tehnichna-osvita-u-globalno-reytingovomu-vimiri/ [in Ukrainian].
10. Chernobai, K.Yu. (n.d.). Reitynhy vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv yak skladova monityronhu yakosti profesiinoi osvity [Ratings of higher educational institutions as a component of monitoring the quality of professional education]. www.narodnaosvita.kiev.ua. Retrieved from http://www.narodnaosvita.kiev.ua/page_id=680 [in Ukrainian].
11. Dugerdil, A., Sponagel, L., Awa Babington-Ashaye & Flahault, A. (2022). International University Ranking Systems and Their Relevance for the Medical and Health Sciences – A Scoping Review. International Journal of Higher Education, 11(5), 102-121 [in English].
12. Education at a glance: OECD Indicators. www.oecd.org. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org [in English].
13. Fauzi, M.A., Tan, C.N.L., Daud, M., & Awalludin, M.M.N. (2020). University rankings: A review of methodological flaws. University Rankings, 30(1), 1-18 [in English].
14. Hrynevych, L.M. (2011). Osvitni indykatory dlia mizhnarodnoho otsiniuvannia (na prykladi dopovidi «Pohliad na osvitu 2011: indykatory OESR») [Educational indicators for international evaluation (on the example of the report «View of education 2011: OECP indicators»]. Teoriia i metodyka upravlinnia osvitoiu – Theory and methods of education management, 7, 1-16. Retrieved from http://arhive.nuv.gov.ua/e-journals/ttmuo/2011_7/3.pdf [in Ukrainian].
15. IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence. ireg-observatory.org. Retrieved from http://ireg-observatory.org/en/ [in English].
16. Jan Sadlak, J., & Nian, C.L. (2007). The World-Class University and Ranking: Aiming Beyond Status. UNESCO-CEPES: Shanghai Jiao Tong University «Cluj University Press» [in English].
17. Karamyshev, D.V. (2019). Stratehichni oriientyry rozvytku monitorynhu osvitnoi diialnosti zakladiv vyshchoi osvity yak skladovoi systemy upravlinnia yakistiu [Strategic guidelines for the development of monitoring of educational activities of higher education institutions as a component of the quality management system]. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia – Pressing Problems of Public Administration, 2(56), 8-19 [in Ukrainian].
18. Karamyshev, D.V. (2019). Transformatsiia systemy reitynhovoho otsiniuvannia rezultativ osvitnoi diialnosti yak instrumentu upravlinnia yakistiu v umovakh intehratsii v yevropeiskyi prostir vyshchoi osvity [Transformation of the rating evaluation system of the results of educational activities as a quality management tool in the conditions of integration into the European space of higher education]. Derzhavne budivnytstvo – State Construction, 2, 1-31. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/DeBu_2019_2_3 [in Ukrainian].
19. Karamyshev, D.V., Hordiienko, L.P., Kundii, Zh.P., Polyviana, O.A., & Koka, V.M. (2023). Universalizatsiia pidkhodiv shchodo otsiniuvannia yakosti provadzhennia osvitnoi diialnosti na osnovi haluzevoho indeksu otsiniuvannia diialnosti zakladiv vyshchoi osvity [Universalization of approaches to the assessment of the quality of educational activities based on the sectoral index for the assessment of the activities of higher education institutions]. Medychna osvita za novymy standartamy: vyklyky ta intehratsiia v mizhnarodnyi osvitnii prostir – Medical education according to new standards: challenges and integration into the international educational space: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference with international participation (pp. 90-94). Poltava: PSMU [in Ukrainian].
20. Karamyshev, D.V., Hryshyna, N.M., & Hrybko, O.V., et al. (2020). Teoretyko-metodychni zasady zabezpechennia yakosti osvity [Theoretical and methodological principles of ensuring the quality of education]. D.V. Karamyshev (Ed.). Kharkiv: Vyd-vo KharRI NADU «Mahistr» [in Ukrainian].
21. Konsolidovanyi reitynh vyshiv Ukrainy 2022 roku [Consolidated rating of higher education institutions of Ukraine in 2022]. osvita.ua. Retrieved from http://osvita.ua/vnz/rating/ [in Ukrainian].
22. Kuzmin, O.Ye., Melnyk, O.H., & Yastrubskyi, M.Ya. (2017). Uzahalnennia polozhen analizuvannia diialnosti VNZ [Generalization of provisions for analyzing the activities of higher education institutions]. Efektyvnist orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnoho mekhanizmu innovatsiinoho rozvytku vyshchoi osvity – Effectiveness of the organizational and economic mechanism of innovative development of higher education: Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 216-225). Kyiv: KNUTD [in Ukrainian].
23. Lin, W.C., & Chen, C. (2021). Novel World University Rankings Combining Academic, Environmental and Resource Indicators. Sustainability, 13(24), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413873 [in English].
24. Nature index. www.natureindex.com. Retrieved from https://www.natureindex.com [in English].
25. Ofitsiinyi veb-sait Tsentru mizhnarodnykh proektiv «Ievroosvita» [Official website of the Center for International Projects «Euro Education»]. euroosvita.net. Retrieved from http://euroosvita.net [in Ukrainian].
26. Parkhomenko, N.O. (2020). Vplyv mizhnarodnykh reitynhiv na konkurentospromozhnist zakladiv vyshchoi osvity. Efektyvna ekonomika [The influence of international ratings on the competitiveness of higher education institutions]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Efficient economy, 3, 1-10. Retrieved from http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/pdf/3_2020/78.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307–2105–2020.3.76[in Ukrainian].
27. Paryzke komiunike vid 25 travnia 2018 r. [Paris Communiqué of May 25, 2018]. mon.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua /storage/app/ media/news2018/06/06/12/paris-communiqueenua2018.pdf [in Ukrainian].
28. Poplavskyi, M. (2022). Natsionalni reitynhy ZVO yak instrument otsiniuvannia yakosti vyshchoi osvity v Ukraini [National ratings of higher education institutions as a tool for evaluating the quality of higher education in Ukraine]. Ukrainskyi informatsiinyi prostir – Ukrainian Information Space, 1(9), 16-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7948.1(9).2022.257057 [in Ukrainian].
29. Pro skhvalennia Stratehii rozvytku vyshchoi osvity v Ukraini na 2022-2032 roky: Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy, 286-р vid 23.02.2022 [On Approval of the Strategy for the Development of Higher Education in Ukraine for 2022-2032: Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy, 286-r vid 23.02.2022]. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/286-2022-%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian].
30. QS World University Rankings methodology: Using rankings to start your university search. www.topuniversities.com. Retrieved from https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2023 [in English].
31. QS World University Rankings. www.topuniversities.com. Retrieved from http://www.topuniversities.com [in English].
32. Ranking Web of Universities. www.webometrics.info. Retrieved from http://www.webometrics.info/en [in English].
33. Rankings Methodology. www.qs.com. Retrieved from https://www. qs.com/rankings/ [in English].
34. Rankings reports and results tables. www.qs.com. Retrieved from http:// www.qs.com [in English].
35. Reitynh Scopus [Scopus rating]. www.euroosvita.net. Retrieved from http://www. euroosvita.net/index.php/?category=58 [in Ukrainian].
36. Reitynh universytetiv za pokaznykamy Scopus 2021 roku [Ranking of universities according to Scopus 2021]. osvita.ua. Retrieved from http://osvita.ua/vnz/rating/82316/ [in Ukrainian].
37. Reitynhy [Ratings]. www.euroosvita.net. Retrieved from http://www.euroosvita.net [in Ukrainian].
38. Sarrico, C.S., & Godonoga, A. (2021). Higher education system rankings and benchmarking. Research Handbook on University Rankings: Theory, Methodology, Influence and Impact, (pp. 197-209). Elgar: Cheltenham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788974981.00025 [in English].
39. Scheerens, J., Glas, C., & Thomas S. (2007). Educational Evaluation, Assessment, and Monitoring: A Systemic Approach. London and New York: Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203971055 [in English].
40. Selten, F., Neylon, C., Huang, C.-K., & Groth, P. (2020). A longitudinal analysis of university rankings. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 1109-1135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00052 [in English].
41. Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG) (2015). Brussels, Belgium [in English].
42. Stoupas, G., Sidiropoulos, A., Katsaros, D., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2021). When universities rise (Rank) high into the skyline. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 15(2), 241-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2021.1955419 [in English].
43. Tatarinov, I.Ye., & Herasymov, O.V. (2013). Svitova praktyka formuvannia reitynhiv universytetiv: vyznachennia naibilsh obiektyvnykh kryteriiv ta indykatoriv otsiniuvannia [The world practice of forming university ratings: determination of the most objective evaluation criteria and indicators]. Ukrainskyi sotsium – Ukrainian society, 1(44), 100-116 [in Ukrainian].
44. Tsiuk, O.A. (2016). Osoblyvosti svitovykh ta ukrainskykh reitynhiv vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv [Peculiarities of world and Ukrainian rankings of higher educational institutions]. Ukrainskyi pedahohichnyi zhurnal – Ukrainian Pedagogical Journal, 2, 57-64 [in Ukrainian].
45. University Rankings. www.4icu.org. Retrieved from https://www.4icu.org/ua/ [in English].
46. Vorobiova, O., Debych, M., Luhovyi, V., Orzhel, O., Sliusarenko, O., & Talanova, Zh., et al. (2019). Otsiniuvannia yakosti vyshchoi osvity v umovakh yevrointehratsii [Evaluation of the quality of higher education in the conditions of European integration]. V. Luhovyi (Ed.). Kyiv: In-t vyshchoi osvity NAPN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
47. Webometrics Ranking of World Universities. www.webometrics.info. Retrieved from http:// www.webometrics.info/ [in English].
48. World University Rankings methodology. www.timeshighereducation.com. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/world-university-rankings-2019-methodology [in English].
49. World University Rankings powered by Scopus data. www.scopus.com. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/ [in English].
50. World University Rankings. Times Higher Education (THE). timeshighereducation.com. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com [in English].
51. Yudina, A.S. (2017). Mizhnarodni reitynhy ta konkurentospromozhnist universytetiv [International rankings and competitiveness of universities]. Visnyk nauky – Herald of Science, 1(24), 25-38 [in Ukrainian].
2. Aguillo, I.F. (Ed.). (2022). Methodology. www.webometrics.info. Retrieved from https://www.webometrics.info/en/Methodology [in English].
3. Aguillo, I.F., Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Ortega, J.L. (2010). Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics, 85(1), 243-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0190-z [in English].
4. Akademichnyi reitynh zakladiv vyshchoi osvity Ukrainy «Top-200 Ukraina 2022» [Academic rating of higher education institutions of Ukraine «Top-200 Ukraine 2022»]. www.euroosvita.net. Retrieved from http://www.euroosvita.net/ [in Ukrainian].
5. Berlin Principles of Ranking of Higher Education Institutions. The Proceedings of 2nd Meeting of the International Rankings Expert Group (IREG): «Methodology and Quality Standards of Rankings». euroosvita.net. Retrieved from http://euroosvita.net/prog/data/doc/BerlinPrinciples.pdf [in English].
6. Bottani, N. (1998). The OECD Educational Indicators: purposes, limits and production processes. Prospects, 18(1), 61-75 [in English].
7. Butler, D. (2010). University rankings smarten up. Nature, 464(7285), 16-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/464016a [in English].
8. Cherepovska, T.V., I. Parubchak, I.O., & Karamyshev D.V. (2021). Higher Education Management System Based on Principles of Strategic Development. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(14), 31-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i14.4806 [in English].
9. Chernetskyi, Yu. (n.d.). Vyshcha tekhnichna osvita – u hlobalno-reitynhovomu vymiri [Higher technical education - in the global rating dimension]. newssky.com.ua. Retrieved from https://newssky.com.ua/vishha-tehnichna-osvita-u-globalno-reytingovomu-vimiri/ [in Ukrainian].
10. Chernobai, K.Yu. (n.d.). Reitynhy vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv yak skladova monityronhu yakosti profesiinoi osvity [Ratings of higher educational institutions as a component of monitoring the quality of professional education]. www.narodnaosvita.kiev.ua. Retrieved from http://www.narodnaosvita.kiev.ua/page_id=680 [in Ukrainian].
11. Dugerdil, A., Sponagel, L., Awa Babington-Ashaye & Flahault, A. (2022). International University Ranking Systems and Their Relevance for the Medical and Health Sciences – A Scoping Review. International Journal of Higher Education, 11(5), 102-121 [in English].
12. Education at a glance: OECD Indicators. www.oecd.org. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org [in English].
13. Fauzi, M.A., Tan, C.N.L., Daud, M., & Awalludin, M.M.N. (2020). University rankings: A review of methodological flaws. University Rankings, 30(1), 1-18 [in English].
14. Hrynevych, L.M. (2011). Osvitni indykatory dlia mizhnarodnoho otsiniuvannia (na prykladi dopovidi «Pohliad na osvitu 2011: indykatory OESR») [Educational indicators for international evaluation (on the example of the report «View of education 2011: OECP indicators»]. Teoriia i metodyka upravlinnia osvitoiu – Theory and methods of education management, 7, 1-16. Retrieved from http://arhive.nuv.gov.ua/e-journals/ttmuo/2011_7/3.pdf [in Ukrainian].
15. IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence. ireg-observatory.org. Retrieved from http://ireg-observatory.org/en/ [in English].
16. Jan Sadlak, J., & Nian, C.L. (2007). The World-Class University and Ranking: Aiming Beyond Status. UNESCO-CEPES: Shanghai Jiao Tong University «Cluj University Press» [in English].
17. Karamyshev, D.V. (2019). Stratehichni oriientyry rozvytku monitorynhu osvitnoi diialnosti zakladiv vyshchoi osvity yak skladovoi systemy upravlinnia yakistiu [Strategic guidelines for the development of monitoring of educational activities of higher education institutions as a component of the quality management system]. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia – Pressing Problems of Public Administration, 2(56), 8-19 [in Ukrainian].
18. Karamyshev, D.V. (2019). Transformatsiia systemy reitynhovoho otsiniuvannia rezultativ osvitnoi diialnosti yak instrumentu upravlinnia yakistiu v umovakh intehratsii v yevropeiskyi prostir vyshchoi osvity [Transformation of the rating evaluation system of the results of educational activities as a quality management tool in the conditions of integration into the European space of higher education]. Derzhavne budivnytstvo – State Construction, 2, 1-31. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/DeBu_2019_2_3 [in Ukrainian].
19. Karamyshev, D.V., Hordiienko, L.P., Kundii, Zh.P., Polyviana, O.A., & Koka, V.M. (2023). Universalizatsiia pidkhodiv shchodo otsiniuvannia yakosti provadzhennia osvitnoi diialnosti na osnovi haluzevoho indeksu otsiniuvannia diialnosti zakladiv vyshchoi osvity [Universalization of approaches to the assessment of the quality of educational activities based on the sectoral index for the assessment of the activities of higher education institutions]. Medychna osvita za novymy standartamy: vyklyky ta intehratsiia v mizhnarodnyi osvitnii prostir – Medical education according to new standards: challenges and integration into the international educational space: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference with international participation (pp. 90-94). Poltava: PSMU [in Ukrainian].
20. Karamyshev, D.V., Hryshyna, N.M., & Hrybko, O.V., et al. (2020). Teoretyko-metodychni zasady zabezpechennia yakosti osvity [Theoretical and methodological principles of ensuring the quality of education]. D.V. Karamyshev (Ed.). Kharkiv: Vyd-vo KharRI NADU «Mahistr» [in Ukrainian].
21. Konsolidovanyi reitynh vyshiv Ukrainy 2022 roku [Consolidated rating of higher education institutions of Ukraine in 2022]. osvita.ua. Retrieved from http://osvita.ua/vnz/rating/ [in Ukrainian].
22. Kuzmin, O.Ye., Melnyk, O.H., & Yastrubskyi, M.Ya. (2017). Uzahalnennia polozhen analizuvannia diialnosti VNZ [Generalization of provisions for analyzing the activities of higher education institutions]. Efektyvnist orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnoho mekhanizmu innovatsiinoho rozvytku vyshchoi osvity – Effectiveness of the organizational and economic mechanism of innovative development of higher education: Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 216-225). Kyiv: KNUTD [in Ukrainian].
23. Lin, W.C., & Chen, C. (2021). Novel World University Rankings Combining Academic, Environmental and Resource Indicators. Sustainability, 13(24), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413873 [in English].
24. Nature index. www.natureindex.com. Retrieved from https://www.natureindex.com [in English].
25. Ofitsiinyi veb-sait Tsentru mizhnarodnykh proektiv «Ievroosvita» [Official website of the Center for International Projects «Euro Education»]. euroosvita.net. Retrieved from http://euroosvita.net [in Ukrainian].
26. Parkhomenko, N.O. (2020). Vplyv mizhnarodnykh reitynhiv na konkurentospromozhnist zakladiv vyshchoi osvity. Efektyvna ekonomika [The influence of international ratings on the competitiveness of higher education institutions]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Efficient economy, 3, 1-10. Retrieved from http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/pdf/3_2020/78.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307–2105–2020.3.76[in Ukrainian].
27. Paryzke komiunike vid 25 travnia 2018 r. [Paris Communiqué of May 25, 2018]. mon.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua /storage/app/ media/news2018/06/06/12/paris-communiqueenua2018.pdf [in Ukrainian].
28. Poplavskyi, M. (2022). Natsionalni reitynhy ZVO yak instrument otsiniuvannia yakosti vyshchoi osvity v Ukraini [National ratings of higher education institutions as a tool for evaluating the quality of higher education in Ukraine]. Ukrainskyi informatsiinyi prostir – Ukrainian Information Space, 1(9), 16-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7948.1(9).2022.257057 [in Ukrainian].
29. Pro skhvalennia Stratehii rozvytku vyshchoi osvity v Ukraini na 2022-2032 roky: Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy, 286-р vid 23.02.2022 [On Approval of the Strategy for the Development of Higher Education in Ukraine for 2022-2032: Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy, 286-r vid 23.02.2022]. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/286-2022-%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian].
30. QS World University Rankings methodology: Using rankings to start your university search. www.topuniversities.com. Retrieved from https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2023 [in English].
31. QS World University Rankings. www.topuniversities.com. Retrieved from http://www.topuniversities.com [in English].
32. Ranking Web of Universities. www.webometrics.info. Retrieved from http://www.webometrics.info/en [in English].
33. Rankings Methodology. www.qs.com. Retrieved from https://www. qs.com/rankings/ [in English].
34. Rankings reports and results tables. www.qs.com. Retrieved from http:// www.qs.com [in English].
35. Reitynh Scopus [Scopus rating]. www.euroosvita.net. Retrieved from http://www. euroosvita.net/index.php/?category=58 [in Ukrainian].
36. Reitynh universytetiv za pokaznykamy Scopus 2021 roku [Ranking of universities according to Scopus 2021]. osvita.ua. Retrieved from http://osvita.ua/vnz/rating/82316/ [in Ukrainian].
37. Reitynhy [Ratings]. www.euroosvita.net. Retrieved from http://www.euroosvita.net [in Ukrainian].
38. Sarrico, C.S., & Godonoga, A. (2021). Higher education system rankings and benchmarking. Research Handbook on University Rankings: Theory, Methodology, Influence and Impact, (pp. 197-209). Elgar: Cheltenham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788974981.00025 [in English].
39. Scheerens, J., Glas, C., & Thomas S. (2007). Educational Evaluation, Assessment, and Monitoring: A Systemic Approach. London and New York: Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203971055 [in English].
40. Selten, F., Neylon, C., Huang, C.-K., & Groth, P. (2020). A longitudinal analysis of university rankings. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 1109-1135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00052 [in English].
41. Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG) (2015). Brussels, Belgium [in English].
42. Stoupas, G., Sidiropoulos, A., Katsaros, D., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2021). When universities rise (Rank) high into the skyline. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 15(2), 241-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2021.1955419 [in English].
43. Tatarinov, I.Ye., & Herasymov, O.V. (2013). Svitova praktyka formuvannia reitynhiv universytetiv: vyznachennia naibilsh obiektyvnykh kryteriiv ta indykatoriv otsiniuvannia [The world practice of forming university ratings: determination of the most objective evaluation criteria and indicators]. Ukrainskyi sotsium – Ukrainian society, 1(44), 100-116 [in Ukrainian].
44. Tsiuk, O.A. (2016). Osoblyvosti svitovykh ta ukrainskykh reitynhiv vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv [Peculiarities of world and Ukrainian rankings of higher educational institutions]. Ukrainskyi pedahohichnyi zhurnal – Ukrainian Pedagogical Journal, 2, 57-64 [in Ukrainian].
45. University Rankings. www.4icu.org. Retrieved from https://www.4icu.org/ua/ [in English].
46. Vorobiova, O., Debych, M., Luhovyi, V., Orzhel, O., Sliusarenko, O., & Talanova, Zh., et al. (2019). Otsiniuvannia yakosti vyshchoi osvity v umovakh yevrointehratsii [Evaluation of the quality of higher education in the conditions of European integration]. V. Luhovyi (Ed.). Kyiv: In-t vyshchoi osvity NAPN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
47. Webometrics Ranking of World Universities. www.webometrics.info. Retrieved from http:// www.webometrics.info/ [in English].
48. World University Rankings methodology. www.timeshighereducation.com. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/world-university-rankings-2019-methodology [in English].
49. World University Rankings powered by Scopus data. www.scopus.com. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/ [in English].
50. World University Rankings. Times Higher Education (THE). timeshighereducation.com. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com [in English].
51. Yudina, A.S. (2017). Mizhnarodni reitynhy ta konkurentospromozhnist universytetiv [International rankings and competitiveness of universities]. Visnyk nauky – Herald of Science, 1(24), 25-38 [in Ukrainian].
Abstract views: 25 PDF Downloads: 33
Published
2023-04-03
How to Cite
Karamyshev, D., & Hordiienko, L. (2023). Brand positioning of the university as strategic guidelines for integration in the international educational space. Public Administration and Regional Development, (19), 66-92. https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2023.19.04
Section
Articles
.png)
.png)
