Career of civil servants in the conditions of reforming the system of public governance in Ukraine
Abstract
The article presents an analysis of the problem of career management of public servants in the context of public administration reform in Ukraine. The results of the evaluation of public administration reform are presented and the factors contributing to the successful career of public servants are described, in particular professionalism, motivation, mobility, qualification, etc.
Today, every state body is based on the principle of bureaucracy. For the effective management of society, the state is important personnel who make up the bureaucracy. A civil servant is able to effectively manage only if he occupies "his" place in terms of professional and personal qualities, has the necessary resources for work and enjoys work.
The inefficiency of the system of professional career management of public servants is stated, attention is focused on such problems as: unwillingness of staff to model professional careers, misunderstanding of group dynamics processes, including mechanisms of interaction and leadership in professional groups, etc.
It is shown that the presence of various theoretical approaches to the concept of "career" is expressed in its fullness of different components. The career combines such areas of activity as: improving the level of professional, personal, cultural development, various and diverse activities for self-presentation, self-promotion, formation, strengthening, maintaining all the necessary relationships that contribute to real internal growth. was noticeable and noticed and appropriately evaluated among employees, and reflected in the form of external growth (promotion, remuneration, etc.). Full career development is practically impossible without the assistance of a career environment aimed at providing the necessary conditions for growth and realization of the growing potential of the individual.
References
2. Dakhno, E.V. (2014). Razvytye professyonalnoi kareri hosudarstvennoho hrazhdanskoho sluzhashcheho v sovremennoi Rossyy [The development of the professional career of a civil servant in modern Russia]. Ystorycheskaia y sotsyalno-obrazovatelnaia misl – Historical and socio-educational thought, 5, 23-32 [in Russian].
3. Dal, V. Y. (2018). Tolkovii slovar zhyvoho velykorusskoho yazika [Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language]. (Vols. 1-4). Moskva : Russkyi yazik-Medya [in Russian].
4. Dementeva, A.A. (2014). Razvytye professyonalnoi kareri hosudarstvennikh sluzhashchykh [Professional development of civil servants]. EHO: Ekonomyka. Hosudarstvo. Obshchestvo – ESS: Economics. State. Society, 2 (17), 26-37 [in Russian].
5. Hlyson, K. (2003). Optymyzatsyia personalnoi deiatelnosty [Personal optimization]. Moskva: ZAO “Olymp-Byznes” [in Russian].
6. Khadzhyradieva, S. K., Aliushyna, N. O., Voronko, L. O. (2017). Profesionalizatsiia u sferi publichnoho upravlinnia : stan, perspektyvy vyrishennia : monohrafiia [Professionalization in the field of public administration: status, prospects: monograph]. Kyiv : NADU [in Ukrainian].
7. Khadzhyradieva, S. K., Husiev, V. O., Rachynskyi, A. P. (2018). Instytutsionalizatsiia publichnoho upravlinnia v Ukraini: stan problem ta perspektyvy rozvytku : monohrafiia [Institutionalization of public administration in Ukraine: the state of problems and prospects for development: a monograph]. Kyiv : NADU [in Ukrainian].
8. Klymenko, A.V. (2012). Rossyiskyi chynovnyk – zadachy na sehodnia [Russian official - tasks for today]. Voprosi hosudarstvennoho y munytsypalnoho upravlenyia – Issues of state and municipal government, 2, 23-32 [in Russian].
9. Morozkov, S. V. (1999). Sotsyalnie faktori professyonalno-trudovoi deiatelnosty hosudarstvennikh sluzhashchykh [Social factors of professional work of civil servants]. Candidate’s thesis. Moskva [in Russian].
10. Myliaeva, L.H. (2013). Teoretyko-metodycheskye aspekti dyahnostyky urovnia razvytyia professyonalnoi kareri spetsyalystov [Theoretical and methodological aspects of diagnosing the level of development of professional career of specialists]. Upravlenye korporatyvnoi kulturoi – Corporate culture management, 2, 110-115 [in Russian].
11. Poliakov, V. A. (1995). Tekhnolohyia karer [Career technology]. Moskva: Delo [in Russian].
12. Reforma derzhavnoho upravlinnia. Zvit pro vykonannia u 2018 rotsi stratehii reformuvannia derzhavnoho upravlinnia Ukrainy na 2016-2020 roky [Public administration reform. Report on the implementation in 2018 of the public administration reform strategy of Ukraine for 2016-2020]. www.kmu.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/ storage/app/sites/1/reform%20office/03_zvit_ukr_web.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
13. Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy: Deiaki pytannia reformuvannia derzhavnoho upravlinnia Ukrainy vid 24 chervnia 2016 roku No 474-r [The order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine: Acts of reforming the reign of the sovereign government of Ukraine 24 days of 2016 2016 rock number 474-r]. Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/474-2016-%D1%80 [in Ukrainian].
14. Siks, U. (2018). Prohres Ukrainy v implementatsii reformy derzhupravlinnia zasluhovuie na vysoku otsinku sam po sobi i v porivnianni [Ukraine's progress in implementing public administration reform deserves high praise in itself and in comparison]. Dzerkalo tyzhnia – Mirror of the week, No1212, 5 zhovtnia 2018. Retrieved from https://dt.ua/SOCIUM/scho-oznachaye-zvit-sigma-dlya-derzhavnogo-upravlinnya-v-ukrayini-290268_.html. [in Ukrainian].
15. Skvortsov, N. N. (1999). Formula delovoho uspekha: ekonomyko-psykholohycheskoe esse [Formula for Business Success: An Economic Psychological Essay]. Kiev.: MAUP [in Russian].
16. Soroka, S. (2018). Reforma derzhavnoho upravlinnia – proity “tochku nepovernennia” do vyboriv [Reform of the sovereign government - to pass the “point of disbelief” to the vibrations]. Dzerkalo tyzhnia – Mirror of the week, No1222, 7 hrudnia 2018. Retrieved from https://dt.ua/ internal/reforma-derzhavnogo-upravlinnya-proyti-tochku-nepovernennya-do-viboriv-296448 [in Ukrainian].
17. Stelmashchuk, L. S. (2011). Teoretyko-orhanizatsiini aspekty funktsionuvannia instytutiv derzhavnoi sluzhby v Ukraini ta SShA: porivnialnyi analiz [Theoretical and organizational aspects of the functioning of civil service institutions in Ukraine and the United States: a comparative analysis]. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok:elektor. nauk. fakh. vyd. – Public administration: improvement and development: elector. Science. profession. kind, 8. Retrieved from http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/index.php?operation=1&iid=315 [in Ukrainian].
18. Vynohradskyi, M., Vynohradska, A., Shkanova, O. (2002). Orhanizatsiia pratsi menedzhera: Navchalnyi posibnyk [Organization of the manager's work: Textbook]. Kyiv. ekonom. in-t menedzhm.. Kyiv: Kondor [in Ukrainian].
19. Zvit pro bazovi vymiriuvannia: Pryntsypy derzhavnoho upravlinnia. Ukraina cherven 2018 roku. SIGMA [Report on basic measurements: Principles of public administration. Ukraine June 2018. SIGMA]. rpr.org.ua. Retrieved from https://rpr.org.ua/news/sigma-otsinyla-derzhavne-upravlinnya-v-ukrajini/ [in Ukrainian].
Abstract views: 199 PDF Downloads: 671