The educational component of state policy in spheres of culture in the conditions of innovative development of society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2022.17.02Keywords:
higher education, the field of education, humanization, state policy in the field of culture, state policy in the field of culture in the field of education, the cultural aspect of education, the educational component of state policy in the field of culture, innovative developmentAbstract
The article substantiates the relevance of the study of the educational component of state policy in the sphere of culture in the conditions of innovative development of society. The analysis of the latest research and publications in a wide range of fundamental and applied interdisciplinary cooperations: public and administrative, cultural, and educational was carried out. A theoretical and methodological rethinking of the role and significance of the educational component of state policy in the field of culture at the current stage of national state formation was carried out, and practical recommendations for its improvement were provided. It is determined and substantiated that the state policy in the field of culture and its educational component contribute to the qualitative development of the main resource of the state - human potential. The role and significance of the cultural aspect of education is revealed and it is proposed to understand under it a purposeful process of education and training, which is based on the transmission and reproduction of cultural values created in the process of spiritual, intellectual, creative activity of people and which correspond to the goals of self-realization of man and society. The analysis of the Law of Ukraine "On Culture", the result of which determined that its influence extends to all social spheres and types and structures of state activity, in particular to the field of education. The triad of main functions (economic, social, cultural) performed by education as a social institution is considered and their interrelationship is determined. It is substantiated that the main strategic goal of the state policy in the field of culture in the field of education should be the formation of spiritual (educational, moral, aesthetic, artistic, etc.) personality qualities of the students of education, the organization and direct implementation of systematic cultural, educational and educational work with them. It was concluded that the priority task of the state policy in the field of culture in the field of education should be to promote the humanistic orientation of all types of educational and educational activities. The thesis is proved that at the current stage of the development of Ukrainian society, the state policy in the field of culture in the field of education faces fundamentally new tasks of training students of education, in particular - training students of higher education (their essence is revealed and recommendations are offered regarding the main directions of their implementation). The main five trends that characterize the modern state policy in the field of culture in the field of education are identified: virtualization; personalization; managed initiative; practical benefit; short term The transformation of the educational component of state policy in the sphere of culture and institutions of higher education of a cultural and artistic profile in the conditions of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine is described. Prospective directions of further theoretical and practical research in the context of this topic are determined.
References
2. Andreiko, I. (2009). Osoblyvosti vplyvu osvity ta kultury na formuvannia osobystosti v konteksti suchasnykh realii hlobalizatsii [Peculiarities of the influence of education and culture on personality formation in the context of modern realities of globalization]. Visnyk NTUU «KPI». Filosofiia. Psykholohiia. Pedahohika – Bulletin of NTUU «KPI». Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 3, 14-18 [in Ukrainian].
3. Bolotnikova, E. (2016). Kulturnaya politika v obrazovanii: shtrikhi k portretu [Cultural policy in education: touches to the portrait]. Proceedings from: Materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Modernizatsiya kultury: ot kulturnoy politiki k vlasti kultury» – Materials of the IV International scientific-practical conference «Modernization of culture: from cultural policy to the power of culture». (pp. 215-221). S. V. Solovyeva. V. I. Ionesov. L. M. Artamonova (Ed.). S.: SGTU [in Russian].
4. Gershunskiy, B. (1991). Gumanizatsiya obrazovaniya: neobkhodimost novoy paradigmy [Humanization of education: the need for a new paradigm]. Magistr – Master, 1, 10-18 [in Russian].
5. Gorlova, I. (1997). Kulturnaya politika. kulturologicheskoye obrazovaniye: regionalnyy aspekt [Cultural policy, cultural education: regional aspect]. Кyiv. (n.d.) [in Russian].
6. Kolnoshenko, V. & Kolnoshenko, O. (2015). Osobennosti sovremennoy gosudarstvennoy kulturnoy politiki i eye znacheniye v sfere professionalnogo obrazovaniya [Features of modern state cultural policy and its significance in the field of vocational education]. Mir obrazovaniya – obrazovaniye v mire – The world of education - education in the world, 4, 22-27 [in Russian].
7. Kosheleva, O., Tsiselska, O. & Kravchuk, O. (2022). Orhanizatsiia osvitnoho protsesu u zakladakh vyshchoi osvity kulturno-mystetskoho profiliu v umovakh voiennoho stanu [Organization of the educational process in institutions of higher education of the cultural and artistic profile under martial law]. Perspektyvy ta innovatsii nauky. – Perspectives and innovations of science, 6 (11), 192-203 [in Ukrainian].
8. Ponomarenko, O. (2008). Sravnitelnyy analiz modeley kulturnoy politiki v sfere obrazovaniya [Comparative analysis of models of cultural policy in the field of education]. Filosofiya obrazovaniya – Philosophy of education, 3, 201-206 [in Russian].
9. Rozin, V. (1992). Filosofiya obrazovaniya: predmet. kontseptsiya. osnovnyye temy i napravleniya izucheniya [Philosophy of education: subject, concept, main topics and areas of study]. Filosofiya obrazovaniya dlya XXI veka – Philosophy of Education for the 21st Century. Moscow, 31-49 [in Russian].
10. Sinetskiy, S. (2011). Vyssheye professionalnoye obrazovaniye v sfere kultury kak faktor kulturnoy politiki [Higher professional education in the field of culture as a factor of cultural policy]. Chelovek i obrazovaniye – Man and education, 4 (29), 20-22 [in Russian].
11. Shved, M. (2014). Vplyv osvity i kultury na rozvytok suspilstva [The influence of education and culture on the development of society]. Rocznik Polsko-Ukraiński «Prace Naukowe Akademi i im. Jana Długosza w Częstochowie» – Polish-Ukrainian Yearbook «Scientific works of the Academy Jan Długosz in Częstochowa», (Vols. 16), 463-471 [in Ukrainian].
12. Shevchuk, H. (2022). Ukrainska osvita v umovakh vyklykiv voiennoho chasu [Ukrainian education in the conditions of wartime challenges]. Aktualni pytannia humanitarnykh nauk – Current issues of humanitarian sciences, issue 51, 745-749 [in Ukrainian].
13. Miednikova, H. (2002). Ukrainska i zarubizhna kultura XX stolittia [Ukrainian and foreign culture of the 20th century]. Kyiv: T-vo «Znannia», KOO [in Ukrainian].
14. Zakon Ukrainy Pro kulturu vid 14 hrudnia 2010 roku № 2778-VI [Law of Ukraine on culture dated December 14, 2010 № 2778-VI]. zakon.rada.gov.ua Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2778-17#Text [in Ukrainian].
15. Picha, V., Picha, Yu. & Khoma, N. (2002). Sotsiolohiia: Terminy, poniattia, personalii [Sociology: Terms, concepts, personalities]. Kyiv: «Karavela», Lviv: «Novyi Svit-2000» [in Ukrainian].
16. Ortynskyi, V. (2009). Pedahohika vyshchoi shkoly [Pedagogy of high school]. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury [in Ukrainian].
17. Nikandrov, N. (1990). Na puti k gumannoj pedagogiki [On the way to humane pedagogy]. Sov. Pedagogika – Soviet Pedagogy, 9, 47-59 [in Russian].
18. Kornetov, G. (1993). Problema bazisnykh pedagogicheskikh traditsiy velikikh tsivilizatsiy [The Problem of Basic Pedagogical Traditions of Great Civilizations]. Svobodnoye vospitaniye – Free upbringing, 2, 18-36 [in Russian].
19. Lerner, I. (1993). Princip gumanizacii pedagogicheskogo processa [The principle of humanization of the pedagogical process]. Pedagogicheskaja teorija: idei i problemy: sb. nauch. tr – Pedagogical theory: ideas and problems: collection of scientific papers. Pedagogicheskaya teoriya: idei i problemy: sb. nauch. tr – Pedagogical theory: ideas and problems collection of scientific papers (pp. 27-30). Moscow: ITPiMIO [in Russian].
20. Ushinskiy, K. (1976). Chelovek kak predmet vospitaniya [Man as a subject of education]. (Vols. 1-2). Moscow: Pedagogika [in Russian].
21. Petrovskiy, A. (1986). Osnovy pedagogiki i psihologii vysshej shkoly [Fundamentals of pedagogy and psychology of higher education]. Мoscow [in Russian].
22. Alekhin, I. (2015). Fenomen pedagogicheskoy kultury kafedralnogo kollektiva [The Phenomenon of the Pedagogical Culture of the Cathedral Staff]. Mir obrazovaniya – obrazovaniye v mire – The world of education – education in the world, 1, 52-57 [in Russian].
23. Kolnoshenko, O. (2008). Povysheniye effektivnosti pedagogicheskogo menedzhmenta obrazovatelnogo protsessa v voyennom vuze [Improving the efficiency of pedagogical management of the educational process in a military university]. Candidate’s thesis. Мoscow [in Russian].
24. Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy: ofitsiinyi vebportal [Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine: official web portal]. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/ua [in Ukrainian].
25. Komarovska, O. & Prosina, O. (2020). Mystetska osvita: vektory reformuvannia [Art education: vectors of reform]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pedahohichnykh nauk Ukrainy – Bulletin of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine, 2 (1), 1-6 [in Ukrainian].
.png)
.png)
