THE NATIONAL STATE IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBALIZATION AND GLOBAL DEMOCRACY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2024.23.11

Keywords:

globalization, global democracy, nation-state, sovereignty, transnational corporations, European Union.

Abstract

The article provides a theoretical and methodological analysis of the processes of globalization and global democracy, examining how these processes alter the position, role, and functions of the modern nation-state while it contends with challenges posed by globalization yet strives to maintain its sovereignty.

 It is characterized that under the pressure of globalization, changes are occurring in the political and economic spheres that influence nation-states, leading to a gradual erosion of their sovereignty and increased susceptibility to economic influences from other states or transnational corporations.

It is noted that the processes of globalization demonstrate the inability of states to fully protect their own interests and citizens from global economic and financial crises, informational impacts, environmental degradation, etc. In such circumstances, the nation-state is no longer the primary actor in the system of international relations, resulting in weakened centralized state institutions, shifts in the perception of state sovereignty, and the emergence of new structures within the global governance system.

 It is substantiated that global democracy, as a phenomenon introduced by the processes of globalization, is a form of implementation of the universal system of political democratic values as the basis for building a democratic society and the formation of public institutions that are the basis of democracy.

It is determined that global democracy is a process of relations between states based on a certain value and normative basis that unites them and keeps them active in the field of certain relations, characterized by the improvement of interconnection between states through the formation of a single information space and the need for a new political order of the world.

 It is emphasized that the processes of globalization and global democracy are objective processes of convergence of political systems of the world, formation of a policy of common standards and approaches to solving common civilization problems.

 It is concluded that for Ukraine, in the context of globalization and global democracy, the main factors of strengthening its sovereignty are the establishment of relations with the international community on the principles of democratic governance, development of a competitive economy, democratization of all spheres of public life, socio-political unity of a civil nation, territorial integrity, and sustainable development of the state.

References

Andrushchenko, V.P. (2018). Orhanizovane suspilstvo: Problemy suspilnoi samoorhanizatsii ta instytualizatsii v period radykalnykh transformatsii v Ukraini na rubezhi stolit: Dosvid sotsialno-filosofskoho analizu [Organized society: Problems of social self-organization and institutionalization in the period of radical transformations in Ukraine at the turn of the century: Experience of socio-philosophical analysis]. Kyiv: Znannia Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].

Baidin, Yu.V. (2012). Derzhavnyi suverenitet i yoho mezhi v umovakh yevropeiskoi intehratsii (pytannia teorii) [State sovereignty and its limits in the conditions of European integration (a question of theory]. Candidate’s thesis [in Ukrainian].

Blavatskyi, S. (2002). Dylema hlobalizatsii ta derzhavnoho suverenitetu [Dilemma of globalization and state sovereignty]. zn.ua. Retrieved from: https://zn.ua/ukr/internal/dilema_ globalizatsiyi_ta_derzhavnogo_suverenitetu.html [in Ukrainian].

Vyznacheno 147 korporatsii, yaki keruiut usim svitom [147 corporations that rule the world have been identified]. (2011). tsn.ua. Retrieved from: https://tsn.ua/groshi/viznacheno-147-korporaciy-yaki-keruyut-usim-svitom.html [in Ukrainian].

Voitovych, R.V. (2007). Vplyv hlobalizatsii na systemu derzhavnoho upravlinnia (teoretyko-metodolohichnyi analiz) [The impact of globalization on the state administration system (theoretical and methodological analysis)]. V.M. Kniazieva (Ed.). Kyiv: Vyd-vo NADU [in Ukrainian].

Voronkova, V.H. (2009). Mistse i rol Ukrainy v hlobalizatsiinykh protsesakh suchasnosti [The place and role of Ukraine in modern globalization processes]. Humanitarnyi visnyk ZDIA– Humanitarian Bulletin ZDIA, 37, (pp. 16-33) [in Ukrainian].

Deklaratsiia pro derzhavnyi suverenitet Ukrainy: dokument vid 16.07.1990 No. 55-XII [Declaration on the State Sovereignty of Ukraine: document dated July 16, 1990 No. 55-XII]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady URSR – Information of the Verkhovna Rada of the Ukrainian SSR, 31, st. 429 [in Ukrainian].

Smolii, V.A. (Eds.). (et al.). (2004). Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy [Encyclopedia of the history of Ukraine]. Kyiv: «Naukova dumka». Retrieved from: http://www.history.org.ua/? termin=Globalizaciya [in Ukrainian].

Yevtushenko, O.N. (2023). Mihratsiini protsesy v krainakh YeS ta Ukraini v umovakh hlobalizatsii ta viiny [Migration processes in EU countries and Ukraine in the conditions of globalization and war]. Publichne upravlinnia ta rehionalnyi rozvytok – Public administration and regional development, 20, (pp. 423-444) [in Ukrainian].

Kovalenko, V.V. (2016). Finansova hlobalizatsiia ta yii vplyv na protsesy zlyttia i pohlynannia bankiv Ukrainy [Financial globalization and its impact on the processes of mergers and acquisitions of Ukrainian banks]. Retrieved from: http://global-national.in.ua/archive/9-2016/ 132.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Koval, Ya.S. (2022). Osoblyvosti funktsionuvannia natsionalnoi derzhavy v umovakh hlobalizatsii [Peculiarities of the functioning of the national state in the conditions of globalization]. ir.kneu.edu.ua. Retrieved from: https://ir.kneu.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/ 3de1d7e4-f9ef-4c68-8059-1c94cef5d56f/content [in Ukrainian].

Kresina, I.O. (2007). Novi tendentsii u doslidzhenni instytutu natsionalnoi derzhavy v umovakh hlobalizatsii [New trends in the study of the institution of the nation state in the conditions of globalization]. Natsionalna derzhava i pravo v umovakh hlobalizatsii – National state and law in the conditions of globalization. Kyiv: Instytut derzhavy i prava im. V. M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].

Krysanov, D.F., & Varchenko, O.M. (2020). Ahrarno ekonomichni systemy v umovakh posylennia ekzohennoi ta endohennoi turbulentnosti [Agrarian economic systems in conditions of increased exogenous and endogenous turbulence]. Ekonomika ta upravlinnia APK – Economy and management of agriculture, 2, (pp. 7-21). Retrieved from: https://rep.btsau.edu.ua/ bitstream/BNAU/5636/1/agrarno-ekonomichni.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Marshalok, T. (2021). Sutnist staloho rozvytku i yoho turbulentnist v sviti ta Ukraini [The essence of sustainable development and its turbulence in the world and Ukraine]. Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy i derzhava – Socio-economic problems and the state, 2 (25), (pp. 523-532). Retrieved from: http://sepd.tntu.edu.ua/images/stories/pdf/2021/21mtystu.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Motren, S. (2014). Hlobalna demokratiia yak pryntsyp mizhtsyvilizatsiinoho dialohu v konteksti svit-systemnykh transformatsii [Global democracy as a principle of intercivilizational dialogue in the context of world-system transformations]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia filos.-politoloh. studii – Bulletin of Lviv University. Philosophical and political science series studio, 4, (pp. 185-196) [in Ukrainian].

Oliinyk, O.M. (2009). Kontseptualizatsiia hlobalizatsii: metodolohichni aspekty [Conceptualization of globalization: methodological aspects]. Humanitarnyi visnyk ZDIA – Humanitarian Bulletin ZDIA, 38, (pp. 41-51) [in Ukrainian].

Pohorska, I.I., & Lakishyk, D.M. (2012). Tsinnist natsionalnoho suverenitetu v teorii ta praktytsi zovnishnoi polityky suchasnoi derzhavy [The value of national sovereignty in the theory and practice of the foreign policy of the modern state]. Problemy mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn – Problems of international relations, 4, (pp. 39-54) [in Ukrainian].

Prushkivska, E.V., & Shevchenko, Yu.O. (2009). Superechnosti rozvytku hlobalizatsii: natsionalnyi aspekt [Contradictions of the development of globalization: the national aspect]. Ekonomichni nauky. Visnyk Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu – Economic sciences. Bulletin of the Zaporizhzhya National University, 1(4), (pp. 161-166) [in Ukrainian].

Pshenychnyi, M.S. Mizhnarodno-pravove rehuliuvannia diialnosti transnatsionalnoi kompanii (TNK) [International legal regulation of activities of a transnational company]. (n.d.). dspace.onua.edu.ua. Retrieved from: http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/11300/3484/% D0%9F%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B9.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [in Ukrainian].

Skrypniuk, O. (2014). Problemy zabezpechennia derzhavnoho suverenitetu Ukrainy na suchasnomu etapi (konstytutsiino-pravovyi aspekt) [Problems of ensuring the state sovereignty of Ukraine at the current stage (constitutional and legal aspect)]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy – Bulletin of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 2 (77), (pp. 18-26) [in Ukrainian].

Stiglits, Dzh. (2003). Hlobalizatsiia ta yii tiahar [Globalization and its burden]. Kyiv: Vyd. dim «KM Akademiia» [in Ukrainian].

Terletska, I. (2017). Vzaiemovplyv politychnoi ta ekonomichnoi sfer v umovakh hlobalizatsii [Interaction of political and economic spheres in the conditions of globalization]. Derzhava ta ekonomika. VISNYK KNTEU – State and economy. KNTEU BULLETIN, 5, (pp. 49-60) [in Ukrainian].

Tsykin, V.O. (2007). Hlobalizatsiia: noosfernyi pidkhid [Globalization: a noospheric approach]. Sumy: SumDPU im. A.S. Makarenka [in Ukrainian].

Yuskiv, B.M. (2009). Hlobalizatsiia i trudova mihratsiia v Yevropi [Globalization and labor migration in Europe]. Rivne: vydavets O. M. Zen [in Ukrainian].

Yavorska, H. (2011). Problema obmezhennia derzhavnoho suverenitetu v umovakh intehratsii Ukrainy do YeS [The problem of limiting state sovereignty in the context of Ukraine's integration into the EU]. niss.gov.ua. Retrieved from: https://niss.gov.ua/doslidzhennya/mizhn arodni-vidnosini/problema-obmezhennya-derzhavnogo-suverenitetu-v-umovakh [in Ukrainian].

Yakoviuk, I.V. (2014). Derzhavnyi suverenitet [State sovereignty]. Teoriia derzhavy i prava – Theory of the state and law, (pp. 56-58). O.V. Petryshyna (Ed.). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Burbach, R., & Robinson, W. (1999). The Fin de Siecle Debate: Globalization as Global Shift. Science and Society, (Vol. 63), 1, (pp. 10-39) [in English].

Ferrer, A. (1996). Historia de globalizacion. Origenes del orden economico mundial. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Economica de Argentina [in Spanish].

Fukuyama, F. (2004). State Building, Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. Ithaca: Cornell University Press [in English].

Heywood, A. Introducing Global Politics. Teaching Resources: Sample chapter from Politics. Retrieved from: http://www.palgrave.com/resources/CW20resources20(by20Author)/H/ Heywood-Global-Politics/9781137349262_sample.pdf [in English].

Hoffmann, S. (2002). Clash of Globalizations. Foreign Affairs, (pp. 104-105) [in English].

Madeley, J. (2008). Big Business, Poor Peoples: How Transnational Corporations Damage the World’s Poor. Retrieved from: https://books.google.com.ua/books?isbn=1848134959 [in English].

Klair, L. (1999). Competing Conceptions of Globalization. Journal of World Systems Research, (Vol. 5), 2, (pp. 143-162) [in English].

Kraus, N.M. & Kraus, K.M. (2018). Digitization in the Conditions of Institutional Transformation of the Economy Basic Components and Tools of Digital Technologies. Intellect XXI, 1, (pp. 211-214) [in English].

Ku, J., & Yoo, J. (2013). Globalization and Sovereignty. Retrieved from: https:// scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1576&context=faculty_scholarship [in English].

Levitt, T. (1983). The Globalization of Markets. Harvard Business Review, (Vol. 61), 3, (pp. 92-102) [in English].

Linz, J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins univ. press [in English].

Mann, M. (1984). The autonomous power of the state: Its origins, mechanisms and results. European journal of sociology, (Vol. 25), 2, (pp. 185-213). Cambridge, UK [in English].

Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: SAGE Publications Ltd [in English].

Robinson, W.I., & Harris, J. (2000). Toward a Global Ruling Class? Globalization and the Transnational Capitalist Class. Science and Society, (Vol. 64), 1, (pp. 11-54) [in English].

Rosenau, J. (1990). Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press [in English].

Scheuerman, W. (2009). Postnational democracies without postnational states? Some skeptical reflections. Ethics and global politics, (Vol. 2), 1, (pp. 41-63) [in English].

Downloads


Abstract views: 463

Published

2024-03-30

How to Cite

Yevtushenko, O., & Gorenko, J. (2024). THE NATIONAL STATE IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBALIZATION AND GLOBAL DEMOCRACY. Public Administration and Regional Development, (23), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2024.23.11

Most read articles by the same author(s)