PROTECTION OF INFORMATION IN THE CYBERSECURITY SYSTEM AS A STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITY FOR STATE MECHANISMS OF NATIONAL VALUES PROTECTION IN UKRAINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2025.27.12Keywords:
state mechanisms of national values protection in Ukraine, strategic implementation priorities for state mechanisms, threats to information security, cybersecurity system, martial law, transformational changes in public administration.Abstract
The article analyses the research of information security threats in the cybersecurity system, which the author considers a strategic implementation priority for state mechanisms of national values protection in Ukraine.
The methodology of the study includes the method of ranking threats to information protection in the cybersecurity system, which is reflected through theoretical foundations and the method of expert research. The author focuses on contemporary methods of information protection in the cybersecurity system concerning the implementation of state mechanisms of national values protection in Ukraine. The results obtained by the researchers allowed us to identify a list of threats in the cybersecurity system to form an information basis for making and implementing management decisions.
The purpose of the article is to identify threats to information protection in the cybersecurity system as one of the strategic implementation priorities for state mechanisms of national values protection in Ukraine under martial law and prospects for transformational changes in public administration in the post-war period of Ukraine based on the theoretical and methodological analysis of scientific literature.
The results obtained by scientists in this area of activity have practical and scientific significance: due to the use of a methodological approach to the formation of information security requirements in the cybersecurity system, segments of strategic priorities for the protection of national values in Ukraine are considered. The author demonstrates the methods used to achieve this goal, in particular, the method of analysing the state of cybersecurity and the methods of description and classification, which contribute to the effective protection of information as one of the strategic implementation priorities for state mechanisms of national values protection in Ukraine.
The methodological approach specifies that it is advisable to describe and only then classify various types of threats and hazards, risks and challenges and, correspondingly, formulate a system of measures to manage them.
Common methods of analysing the level of cyber security assurance include methods of studying the cause-and-effect relationships between threats and hazards; the search for the reasons that caused and led to the actualisation of certain hazards is carried out. The author proposes measures to neutralise threats to information protection in the cybersecurity system as one of the strategic implementation priorities for state mechanisms of national values protection in Ukraine.
References
Ilchenko, O., Chumak, V., Kuzmenko, S., Shelukhin, O., & Dobrovinskyi, A. (2019). Fishing as a cybercrime in the Internet banking system: economic and legal aspects. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory, 22(2), (pp. 1-6). Retrieved from: https://dspace.univd.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/5a768643-b341-4db2-84dd-65311c55eb48/content [in English].
Chowdhury, N., Nystad, E., Reegård, K., & Gkioulos, V. (2022). Cybersecurity training in Norwegian critical infrastructure companies. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 12(3), (pp. 299-310). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.120304 [in English].
Yemelyanov, V., Nikonenko, U., Sytnyk, Y., Okhrimenko, I., & Shulga, A. (2022). Model of countering information and technical threats to intellectual capital management of innovation-oriented systems in the machine-building sector. Ingénierie des Systemes d'Information, 27(5), (pp. 799-806). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.270513 [in English].
Kryshtanovych, M., Filippova, V., Huba, M., Kartashova, O., & Molnar, O. (2020). Assessment of the implementation of the circular economy in EU countries in the context of sustainable development. Business: theory and practice, 21(2), (pp. 704-712). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.12482 [in English].
Kryshtanovych, M., Petrovskyi, P., Khomyshyn, I., Bezena, I., & Serdechna, I. (2020). Peculiarities of the implementation of governance in the social protection system. Business, Management and Economics Engineering, 18(1), (pp. 142-156). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2020.12177 [in English].
Kryshtanovych, S., Liubomudrova, N., Tymofieiev, S., Shmyhel, O., & Komisarenko, A. (2022). Modeling ways to counter external threats to corporate security of machine-building enterprises in the context of COVID-19. International Information and Engineering Technology Association, 12(2), (pp. 217-222). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.120210 [in English].
Magruk, A. (2016). Uncertainty in the field of Industry 4.0 – potential directions for research. Business, Management and Economic Engineering, 14(2), (pp. 275-291). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2016.332 [in English].
Gordieiev, O., Kharchenko, V., Illiashenko, O., Morozova, O., & Gasanov, M. (2021). The concept of using eye tracking technology to assess and ensure cybersecurity, functional safety and usability. International Information and Engineering Technology Association, 11(4), (pp. 361-367). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.110409 [in English].
Lainjo, B. (2020). Network security and its implications on program management. International Information and Engineering Technology Association, 10(6), (pp. 739-746). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.100603 [in English].
Jing, Q., Vasilakos, A.V., Wan, J., Lu, J., & Qiu, D. (2014). Security of the Internet of Things: Perspectives and challenges. Wireless Networks, 20, (pp. 2481-2501). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-014-0761-7 [in English].
Emanov, V., Pasichnyk, V., Yevtushenko, I., Larin, S., & Mykhailenko, O. (2023). Ranking Threats to Determine the Cost of Protecting Information in a Cybersecurity Environment. Ingénierie des Systemes d'Information, (Vol. 28), 1, (pp. 77-84). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.280108 [in English].
Sylkin, O., Shtanhret, A., Ohirko, O., & Melnykov, A. (2018). Assessing the financial security of the engineering enterprises as preconditions of application of anti-crisis management. Business and Economic Horizons, 14 (4), (pp. 926-940). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.15208/beh.2018.63 [in English].
Sylkin, O., Kryshtanovych, M., Zachepa, A., Bilous, S., & Krasko, A. (2019). Modeling the process of applying anti-crisis management in the system of ensuring financial security of the enterprise. Business: theory and practice, 20, (pp. 446-455). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2019.41 [in English].
Musman, S., & Turner, A. (2018). A game oriented approach to minimizing cybersecurity risk. WIT Press, 8(2), (pp. 212-222). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V8-N2-212-222 [in English].
Dumchykov, M., Utkina, M., & Bondarenko, O. (2022). Cybercrime as a Threat to the National Security of the Baltic States and Ukraine. International Information and Engineering Technology Association, 12(4), (pp. 481-490). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.120409 [in English].
Leukfeldt, E., Lavorgna, A., & Kleemans, E. (2017). Organised cybercrime or cybercrime that is organised? An assessment of the conceptualisation of financial cybercrime as organised crime. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 23(3), (pp. 287-300). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-016-9332-z [in English].
Martínez, J., & Durán, J. (2021). Software supply chain attacks, a threat to global cybersecurity: SolarWinds’ case study. International Information and Engineering Technology Association, 11(5): 537-545. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.110505 [in English].
Fakiha, B. (2021). Business organization security strategies to cyber security threats. International Information and Engineering Technology Association, 11(1), (pp. 101-104). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.110111 [in English].
Yemelyanov, V., & Bondar, H. (2019). Kiberbezpeka yak skladova natsionalnoi bezpeky ta kiberzakhyst krytychnoi infrastruktury ukrainy. Publichne upravlinnia ta rehionalnyi rozvytok – Public Administration and Regional Development, (5), (pp. 493-523). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2019.05.02
Singh, J., Pasquier, T., Bacon, J., Ko, H., & Eyers, D. (2016). Twenty security considerations for cloud-supported Internet of Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(3), (pp. 269-284). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2015.2460333 [in English].
Tamburri, D.A., Miglierina, M., & Di Nitto, E. (2020). Cloud applications monitoring: An industrial study. Information and Software Technology, 127. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106376 [in English].
.png)
.png)
