European experience in the sphere of interaction of the state and civil society institutions

Keywords: European Union, institutions of power, civil society, civil sector, state policy, integration, interaction


The article examines the issues of interaction between the state and civil society in the context of the experience of European countries, defines the forms of such interaction, the possibility of applying European experience in Ukraine.

It is pointed out that the development of a democratic, legal, social state is a key and important priority, and the implementation of the most important strategic course towards integration with the European Union is the ultimate goal of this process; this is also facilitated by ensuring the comprehensive entry of Ukraine into the European political, economic and legal space.

The article reveals the interaction of civil society institutions and the state, which should be formed on the European generally accepted principles, such as mutual cooperation, partnership.

It is shown that the state, forming the institutional and legal environment, comprehensively contributes to the interaction and development of civil society.

It is indicated that the current trend in relations between government bodies and civil society institutions is the transformation of the grant system into a system of contracts, which enhances the reduction of the financial dependence of civil society on government authorities.

It was found that the EU countries have introduced and operate such institutions for effective discussion and decision-making: for example, the eOpinio platform in Germany uses the “general budget” tool, with the help of which public discussion of the municipal budget is carried out and part of the funds is spent on ideas supported by the majority societies on the Estonian portal "" you can remotely participate in public hearings and hearings in municipal authorities. In Latvia, an internet platform has been created that allowed people to present political initiatives and collect signatures of support online, the Government of Macedonia has developed three electronic platforms to involve civil society in the policy-making process:, ENER Platform and mk.

It was stated that, in general, the EU countries are gradually abandoning the format of meetings of advisory bodies in favor of online consultations with the public.


1. Akaiomova, A. V. (Ed.). (2012). Istorychnyi dosvid stanovlennia instytutiv hromadianskoho suspilstva v krainakh Yevropy [Historical experience of the formation of civil society institutions in European countries]. Kyiv : Foliant [in Ukrainian].
2. Balaban, R. V. (Ed.). (2013). Derzhava i hromadianske suspilstvo v Ukraini: poshuk kontseptsii spivpratsi : analit. dop. [The state and civil society in Ukraine: the search for the concept of cooperation: an analyst. ext.]. Kyiv : IPiEND im. I. F. Kurasa [in Ukrainian].
3. Batanov, O. V. (2015). Mistseve samovriaduvannia yak instytut hromadianskoho suspilstva: aksiolohichni ta ontolohichni aspekty [Local self-government as an institution of civil society: axiological and ontological aspects]. Chasopys Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia». Seriia «Pravo» – Journal of the National University "Ostroh Academy". Law Series, 1(11). Retrieved from /2015/n1/15bovtoa.pdf [in Ukrainian].
4. Danko, Yu. A. (2015). Astroturfinh yak instrument virtualnoi manipuliatsii ta politychnoi propahandy v umovakh informatsiinoi doby [Astroturfing as a tool of virtual manipulation and political propaganda in the information age]. Suchasne suspilstvo – Modern society, 2, 38–49 [in Ukrainian].
5. Derzhaliuk, O. Dynamika ta rozshyrennia spektru diialnosti hromadskykh orhanizatsii yak skladovi demokratyzatsii ukrainskoho suspilstva: Analitychna zapyska [Dynamics and expansion of the range of activities of public organizations as components of democratization of Ukrainian society: Analytical note]. Retrieved from May08Z03.htm [in Ukrainian].
6. Kalinicheva, H. (2010). Yevropeiskyi tsyvilizatsiinyi vymir rozbudovy hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini [European civilization dimension of civil society development in Ukraine]. Viche: teoretychnyi i hromadsko-politychnyi zhurnal – Viche: theoretical and socio-political journal, 22 (283), 2-4. Kyiv: Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
7. Karas, A. (2003). Filosofiia hromadianskoho suspilstva u klasychnykh teoriiakh i neklasychnykh interpretatsiiakh [Philosophy of civil society in classical theories and non-classical interpretations]. Kyiv-Lviv [in Ukrainian].
8. Korniievskyi, O. A. (2012). Metodolohichna rol kontseptu hromadianskoho suspilstva v politychnii modernizatsii Ukrainy [Methodological role of the concept of civil society in the political modernization of Ukraine]. Rozvytok vzaiemodii derzhavy i hromadianskoho suspilstva v konteksti vprovadzhennia yevropeiskykh pryntsypiv nalezhnoho vriaduvannia: mizhn. nauk.-prakt. konf. – Kyiv – Development of interaction between the state and civil society in the context of implementation of European principles of good governance: int. scientific-practical conf., 335-342. Kyiv: NIS [in Ukrainian].
9. Kovbasiuk, Yu. V. (2011). Entsyklopediia derzhavnoho upravlinnia [Encyclopedia of Public Administration]. (Vols. 1-8). Nats. akad. derzh. upr. pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy. Kyiv: Vyd-vo NADU [in Ukrainian].
10. Krasnosilska, A. O., Latsyba, M. V., Voloshyna, A. V., Kuprii, V. O., Chermoshentseva, N. M., & Vashchuk, O. L. (2013). Derzhavna polityka spryiannia rozvytku hromadianskoho suspilstva : Metodychni rekomendatsii [State policy to promote the development of civil society : Methodological recommendations]. Kyiv : Ahentstvo «Ukraina» [in Ukrainian].
11. Kresina, I. (2007). Derzhava i hromadianske suspilstvo v Ukraini: problemy vzaiemodii [The state and civil society in Ukraine: problems of interaction]. Kyiv: Lohos [in Ukrainian].
12. Kresina, I. O. (Ed.). (2014). Polityko-pravovi mekhanizmy zapobihannia separatyzmu v demokratychnomu suspilstvi [Political and legal mechanisms to prevent separatism in a democratic society]. Kyiv : In-t derzhavy i prava im. V. M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
13. Krytskaliuk, N. I. (2014). Instytualizatsiia hromadianskoho suspilstva yak osnovnyi kryterii demokratycheskoho rozvytku [Institutionalization of civil society as the main criterion of democratic development]. Visnyk KNUTSh. Filosofiia. Politolohiia – Bulletin of KNUTSH. Philosophy. Politology, 1(115), 61-64 [in Ukrainian].
14. Kuprii, V. Uchast orhanizatsii hromadianskoho suspilstva v protsesi vyroblennia derzhavnoi polityky [Participation of civil society organizations in the process of state policy development]. Retrieved from [in Ukrainian].
15. Latsyba, M. V. (Ed.). (2011). Pravovi umovy rozvytku hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini. Shcho potribno zrobyty? [Legal conditions for the development of civil society in Ukraine. What to do?]. Kyiv.: Ahentstvo «Ukraina» [in Ukrainian].
16. Lypovska, N., & Pysmennyi, I. (2015). Hromadianskyi dialoh yak forma vzaiemodii mizh vladoiu ta suspilstvom [Civil dialogue as a form of interaction between government and society]. Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia. Teoriia ta istoriia publichnoho upravlinnia – Aspects of public administration. Theory and history of public administration, 9 (23), 5–11 [in Ukrainian].
17. Matiichyk, A. V. (2015). Polityko-kulturni chynnyky instytutsionalizatsii hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini [Political and cultural factors of institutionalization of civil society in Ukraine]. Visnyk Prykarpatskoho universytetu. Politolohiia – Bulletin of the Precarpathian University. Politology, 9, 31-38. Ivano-Frankivsk: LIK [in Ukrainian].
18. Matiichyk, A. V. (2015). Sotsialni merezhi yak zasib samoorhanizatsii hromadianskoho suspilstva [Social networks as a means of self-organization of civil society]. Politolohichni zapysky – Political science notes, 2 (12), 70–80 [in Ukrainian].
19. Nesterovych, V. (2015). Instytutsiine utverdzhennia elektronnykh petytsii v Ukraini v konteksti zarubizhnoho dosvidu [Institutional approval of electronic petitions in Ukraine in the context of foreign experience]. Viche – Chamber, 22 (402), 18-23 [in Ukrainian].
20. Novoskoltseva, L. O. (2012). Problema formuvannia hromadianskoho suspilstva v nezalezhnii Ukraini: monohrafiia [The problem of forming a civil society in independent Ukraine: monograph]. Luhansk : Elton-2 [in Ukrainian].
21. Sofinska, I. (2012). Hromadianske suspilstvo i pryntsyp subsydiarnosti: pohliad kriz pryzmu Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [Civil society and the principle of subsidiarity: a view through the prism of the European Union]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu im. Ivana Franka : zbirnyk naukovykh prats – Bulletin of Lviv University. Ivan Franko: a collection of scientific works, 56, 194-202. Lviv: Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu im. Ivana Franka [in Ukrainian].
22. Sosnin, O. (2012). Informatsiino-komunikatyvna kompetentnist hromadianyna v protsesakh formuvannia hromadianskoho suspilstva [Information and communicative competence of a citizen in the processes of forming a civil society]. Viche: teoretychnyi i hromadsko-politychnyi zhurnal – Viche: theoretical and socio-political journal, 20 (329), 22-26. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
23. Udoskonalennia normatyvno-pravovoho zabezpechennia orhanizatsii hromadianskoho suspilstva u konteksti pidpysannia Uhody pro asotsiatsiiu… 10.01.2016 [Improving the legal framework for civil society organizations in the context of signing the Association Agreement…]. Retrieved from 2/5 [in Ukrainian].
24. Usachenko, L. Publichni konsultatsii yak skladova efektyvnosti vzaiemodii vitchyznianykh ta hromadskykh struktur v konteksti mizhnarodnoho dosvidu [Public consultations as a component of the effectiveness of interaction between domestic and public structures in the context of international experience]. Retrieved from [in Ukrainian].
25. Yablonskyi, V. M., Korniievskyi, O. A., & Vozniuk, P. F. (2014). Hromadianske suspilstvo Ukrainy: suchasnyi stan i perspektyvy vprovadzhennia yevropeiskykh standartiv vzaiemodii z derzhavoiu [Civil society of Ukraine: current state and prospects of implementation of European standards of interaction with the state: zb. materials international. scientific-practical conf.]. Kyiv: NISD [in Ukrainian].
26. Zakirova, S. (2015). Efektyvnist systemy elektronnykh petytsii v Ukraini: analiz i zasterezhennia pershoho dosvidu [The effectiveness of the system of electronic petitions in Ukraine: analysis and reservations of the first experience]. Retrieved from [in Ukrainian].
27. Zaslavska, O. (2013). Zasoby masovoi informatsii yak instrument politychnoi komunikatsii [Mass media as a tool of political communication]. Abstracts: XI mezhdunarodnii semynar «Relyhyia y hrazhdanskoe obshchestvo: mezhkonfessyonalnii y etnycheskyi konflykty v uslovyiakh heopolytycheskoi konkurentsyy» – 11th international seminar «Religion and civil society: interfaith and ethnic conflicts in the context of geopolitical competition» (pp. 59-63). Sevastopol : Veber [in Ukrainian].
28. Zelenko, H. I. (2015). Problema «vkliuchennia» hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini [The problem of "inclusion" of civil society in Ukraine]. Rehionalna polityka : zakonodavche rehuliuvannia ta praktychna realizatsiia: materialy Pershoi Mizh nar.nauk.-prakt.konf – Regional policy: legislative regulation and practical implementation: materials of the First International scientific-practical conference, 384, 87-90. Kyiv-Ternopil : Aston [in Ukrainian].

Abstract views: 42
PDF Downloads: 23
How to Cite
Shtyrov, A., & Yemelyanov, V. (2020). European experience in the sphere of interaction of the state and civil society institutions. Public Administration and Regional Development, (9), 940-965.