Principles and methods of forsite research in public management and administration

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2021.12.05

Keywords:

foresight, public administration, bibliometric analysis, expert panels, scenario analysis, multicriteria analysis

Abstract

The work is devoted to the possibility of using Foresight to predict the development of state and public administration processes.

The aim of the work is to review and systematize key aspects, principles and methods of conducting foresight research that can be used in state and public administration.

The article discusses the basic principles of foresight research, among which the principles of involvement, communication, consistency, coordination, and diversity are distinguished; the main stages of foresight research are highlighted.

Foresight studies can differ in their level depending on the scale of the study area and in the time horizon, depending on the time interval for which the forecast is made.

Sources of providing research with scientific and technical information can be scientometric databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, Orbit, and the like. For its analysis, various indicators are used, such as the citation index, the Hirsch index, etc.

The basic procedure for most Foresight projects is expert panels. It may differ in the way the expert group is formed, the method of collecting expert information and the methods of its processing.

The most commonly used tools for analyzing different variants of future are scenario and multicriteria analysis. To construct scenarios of the future, the methods of the predictive graph and "decision tree", as well as cognitive modeling, are used.

Multi-criteria analysis is defined as the structuring of the process of assessing and choosing alternative scenarios in conditions of high uncertainty and the presence of conflicts of expert assessments. Its most famous and widespread methods are AMH and ANM and the method of Pareto optimal solutions.

References

Afanasiev, M.M. (2017). Sovershenstvovaniie metodolohii forsaita kak instrumenta strtehicheskoho razvitiia promyshlennykh rehionov i otraslei [Improvement of the foresight methodology as a tool for the strategic development of industrial regions and industries]. Rossiiskoie predprinimatelstvo – Russian entrepreneurship, (Vol. 18), (pp. 2481-2489) [in Russian].

Amini, H., Jabalameli, M.S., & Ramesht, M.H. (2021). Development of regional foresight studies between 2000 and 2019: an overview and co-citation analysis. European Journal of Futures Research, (Vol. 8), 1. Retrieved from https://eujournalfuturesresearch.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40309-021-00170-7 [in English].

Andersen, P.D., Hansen, M., & Selin, C. (2021). Stakeholder inclusion in scenario planning – A review of European projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (Vol. 169). Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040162521002341 [in English].

Andreichikov, A.V., & Andreichikov, O.N. (2014). Metody intelektualnoi sistemy priniatiia reshenii dlia provedeniia Forsait-issledovanii [Methods of an intelligent decision-making system for conducting foresight research]. Electronnyi Zhurnal Cloud of Science – Electronic journal Cloud of Science, (Vol. 1), 3, (pp. 1-30) [in Russian].

Anzules-Falcones, W., Diaz-Marquez, A.M., Padilla, L., Hernan-Hidalgo, D., & Sanchez-Grisales D. (2021). Foresight for small and medium enterprises in the context of the circular economy. Forsait – Foresight and STI Governance, (Vol. 15), 1, (pp. 86-96). Retrived from https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/en/2021-15-1/454924897.html [in English].

Avdzeiko, V.I., Karnyshev, V.I., & Mescheriakov, R.V. (2018). Patentnyi analis. Vyiavleniie perspektivnykh i proryvnykh tekhnolohii [Patent analysis. Identifying promising and disruptive technologies]. Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki – Innovation economy issues, (Vol. 8), 1, (pp. 79-90) [in Russian].

Belousov, D.R. (Eds.). (2012). Metod «kartirovaniia tekhnolohii» v poiskovykh prohnozakh [Technology mapping method in search forecasts]. Forsait – Foresight and STI Governance, 2, (pp. 6-16) [in Russian].

Brummer, W. (2010). Mnohoobrasiie v Forsait-issledovaniiakh (praktika obzora innovatsionnykh idei [Diversity in Foresight Research (the practice of reviewing innovative ideas)] Forsait – Foresight and STI Governance, (Vol. 4), 4, (pp. 56-68) [in Russian].

Fedulova, L.I. (2008). Forsait: suchasna metodolohiia tekhnolohichnoho prohnozuvannia [Foresight: modern methodology of technological programming]. Ekonomika i prohnozuvannia – Economics and programming, 3, (pp. 106-120) [in Ukrainian].

Fesiun, A.V. (2016). Forsait kak tekhnolohiia realizatsii stratehii razvitiia nanoindustrii [Foresight as a technology for implementing nanoindustry development strategy]. Vestnik VHU, seriia: ekonomika i upravleniie – Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Economics and Management, 1, (pp. 144-152) [in Russian].

Hibson, E. (Eds.). (2018). Bibliometricheskii analiz kak instrument vliianiia rasprostronionnykh i voznikaiuschikh metodov tekhonolohicheskoho Forsaita [Bibliometric Analysis as a Tool for Influencing Common and Emerging Technological Foresight Methods]. Forsait – Foresight and STI Governance, 1, (pp. 6-24) [in Russian].

Kalinichev, V.L. (2018). Nuzhen li v vysshei shkole FORSAIT [Does a higher school need FORESIGHT]. Biznes i dizain reviu – Business and design review, 3 [in Russian].

Kim, J.-M., Sun, B., & Jun, S. (2019). Sustainable technology analysis using data envelopment analysis and state space models. Sustainability (Switzerland), (Vol. 11), 13. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334136327_Sustainable_Technology_

Analysis_Using_Data_Envelopment_Analysis_and_State_Space_Models [in English].

Kleiton, E. (2008). Tekhnolohicheskiie dorozhnyie karty [Technological roadmaps]. Forsait – Foresight and STI Governance, 3, (pp. 68-74) [in Russian].

Kosheleva, T.N., & Tsypok, A.S. (2017). Sistemnyie issledovaniia nauchno-tekhnicheskoi infornatsii pri realizatsii mekhnizmov innovatsionnoho razvitiia [System research of scientific and technical information in the implementation of innovative development mechanisms]. Ekonomika i uoravleniie – Economics and Management, 5 (139), (pp. 50-55) [in Russian].

Kovalenko, I. I., & Koshkin, K.V. (2003). Stsenarnyi podkhod v analize innovatsionnykh ptoektov [Scenario approach in the analysis of innovative projects]. Mykolaiv: UHMTU [in Russian].

Kovalenko, I.I. (Eds.). (2017). Metody sistemnoho analiza v zadachakh morskikh klasterov [Methods of system analysis in the problems of marine clusters]. Kharkiv: ChP izdatelstvo «Novoie slovo» [in Russian].

Kovalenko, I.I., & Shved, A.V. (2013). Ekspertnyie tekhnolohii podderzhki priniatiia reshenii [Expert decision support technologies]. Mykolaiv: Ilion [in Russian].

Kovalenko, I.I., Honcharova, N.V. (2020). Systemni tekhnolohii vykorystannia metodiv dlia provedennia Forsait-doslidzhenn [System technologies for the use of methods for conducting foresight research]. Proceedings from Mohyla Readings – 2020: XXIII All-Ukrainian annual scientific-practical conference «Mohyla Readings – 2020: Experiences and Trends in Society Development in Ukraine: Global, National and Regional Aspects». Mykolaiv: vydavnytstvo ChNU imeni Petra Mohyly [in Ukrainian].

Kriukov, S.V. (2010). Forsait: ot prohnoza k formirovaniiu buduscheho [Foresight: from forecasting to shaping the future]. Terra Economicus – Terra Economicus, (Vol. 8), 3, (pp. 7-17) [in Russian].

Kushnich, A.A. (2010). Kompiuternyie sistemy modelirovaniia kohnitivnykh kart: podkhody i metody [Computer systems for modeling cognitive maps: approaches and methods]. Problemy upravleniia – Control problems, 3, (pp. 2-16) [in Russian].

Kvitka, S.A. (2016). Forsait yak tekhnolohiia proektuvannia maibutnioho: novitni mekhanizmy vzaiemodii publichnoii vlady, biznesu ta hromadianskoho suspilstva [Foresight as a technology for designing the future: the latest mechanisms of interaction between public authorities, business and civil society] Aspekty publichnoho upravleniia – Aspects of public administration, 8, (pp. 5-15) [in Ukrainian].

Kvitka, S.A. (2019). Innovatsionnyie mekhanizmy v publichnom upravlenii: Forsait [Innovative Mechanisms in Public Administration: Foresight]. Aspekty publichnoho upravleniia – Aspects of public administration, (Vol. 7), 4, (pp. 5-18) [in Russian].

Magruk, A. (2020). Uncertainties, knowledge, and futures in foresight studies – a case of the industry 4.0. Forsait – Foresight and STI Governance, (Vol. 14), 4, (pp. 20-33). Retrieved from https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/en/2020-14-4/425736656.html [in English].

Melnychenko, S., Boiko, M., Okhrimenko, A., Bosovska, M., & Mazaraki, N. (2020). Foresight technologies of economic systems: Evidence from the tourism sector of Ukraine. Problemy ta perspektyvy menegmantu – Problems and Perspectives in Management, (Vol. 18), 4, (pp. 303-318). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347845850_Foresight_technologies_of_economic_systems_evidence_from_the_tourism_sector_of_Ukraine [in English].

Mikova, N.S., & Sokolova, A.V. (2014). Monitorinh hlobalnykh tekhnolohicheskikh trendov [Monitoring global technology trends]. Forsait – Foresight and STI Governance, (Vol. 8), 4, (pp. 64-83) [in Russian].

Mironova, N.A. (2011). Intehratsiia modifikatsii metoda analiza iierarkhii dlia sistem podderzhki priniatiia hruppovykh reshenii [Integration of modifications of the hierarchy analysis method for group decision support systems]. Radioelektronika, informatika, upravlinni – Radio electronics, computer science, management, 2, (pp. 47-54) [in Russian].

Mironova, N.A., & Tabunschik, H.V. (2010). Ekspertiza system vybora modifikatsii metoda analiza iierarkhii [Expert system for choosing a modification of the hierarchy analysis method]. ASU i pribory avtomatiki: vseukrainskii mezhvedomstvennyi nauchno-tekhnicheskii sbornik – ACS and automation devices: all-Ukrainian interdepartmental scientific and technical collection, 153, (pp. 62–70) [in Russian].

Nestik, T.A. (2018). Psychological aspects of corporate Foresight. Forsait – Foresight and STI Governance, 2, (pp. 78-90) [in English].

Nohin, V.D. (2007). Priniatiie reshenii pri mnohikh kriteriiakh [Multi-criteria decision making]. St. Petersburg: «YuTAS» [in Russian].

Nohin, V.D. (2011). Problemy suzheniia mnozhestva Pareto: podkhody k resheniiu [The problem of narrowing the Pareto set: approaches to solving]. Isskustvennyi intellect i priniatiie reshenii – Artificial intelligence and decision making, 1, (pp. 67-81) [in Russian].

Pankov, S.E. (2019). Metodika otsenki urovnia novizny rezultatov fundamentalnykh i prikladnykh issledovanii [Methodology for assessing the level of novelty of the results of fundamental and applied research]. Kompetentnost –Competency, 9-10, (pp. 5-13) [in Russian].

Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Network of Plansible Inference. California, San Mateo: Morgan Kanfmann Publishers Inc. [in English].

Rybintsev, V.O., & Klopov, I.O. (2017). Forsait yak tekhnolohiia realizatsii stratehii rozvytku ekonomiky [Foresight as a technology for implementing the strategy of economic development ]. Intelekt XXI – Intelligence XXI, 3, (pp. 87-93) [in Ukrainian].

Shafer, G.A. (1976). A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press [in English].

Shevchenko, E.V., & Stukach, V.F. (2016). Forsait: instrument issledovaniia, osnova formirovaniia hosudarstvennoi stratehii [Foresight: a research tool, a basis of formation of the state strategy]. Retrieved from: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/75177/1/MPRA_paper_75177.pdf [in Russian].

Shostak I.V., Kyzym, M.O., Matiushenko, I.Yu., & Danova, M.O. (2015). Perspektyvy forsait-prohnozuvannia priorytetnykh napriamiv rozvytku nanotekhnolohii i nanotekhnolohii u krainakh svitu i Ukraini [Prospects for foresight of priority directions of development of nanotechnology and nanomaterials in countries of the world and Ukrain]. Kharkiv: VD «Inzhek» [in Ukrainian].

Shostak, I.V., & Danova, M.A. (2014). Podkhod kompleksnoi avtomatizatsii natsionalnykh forsait-proektov [An approach to comprehensive automation of national foresight projects]. Aviatsionno-kosmicheskaia tekhnika i tekhnolohiia – Aerospace engineering and technology, 8 (115), (pp. 179-188) [in Russian].

Shvets, A.V., Deviatkin, D.A., Smirnov, I.V. (2014). Issledovaniie system i metodov naukometricheskoho analiza nauchnykh publikatsii [Research of systems and methods of scientometric analysis of scientific publications]. Iskusstvennyi intellect i priniatiie reshenii – Artificial intelligence and decision making, 3, (pp. 62-71) [in Russian].

Smarandache, F., & Dezert, J. (2006). Advances and applications of DSmT for Information Fusion. (Vol. 2). Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.454.6263&rep=rep1&type=pdf [in English].

Sokolov, A.V. (2007). Metod kriticheskikh tekhnolohii [Critical technology method]. Forsait – Foresight and STI Governance, 4 (4), (pp. 64-75) [in Russian].

Tereshyna, N.P., Tretiak, V.P., & Metelkin, P.V. (2019). Forsait-tekhnolohii: uchebnoie posobiie [Foresight technologies: a tutorial]. Moscow: RUT (MIIT) [in Russian].

Trakhtenherts, E.A. (1998). Kompiuternaia podderzhka priniatiia reshenii [Computer support for decision making]. Мoscow: SINTET [in Russian].

Tretiak, V.P. (2008). Orhanizatsionnoie obespecheniie primeneniia tekhnolohii forsaita [Organizational support for the use of foresight technology]. Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie. – The science. Innovation. Education, (Vol. 3), 2, (pp. 155-172) [in Russian].

Uzga-Rebrovs, O. (2010). Nenoteiktiby parvaldisana (Vol. 3). Rezekne: RA Izdevnieciba [in Latvian].

Valkman, Yu.R., Bykov, V.S., & Rykhalskii, A.Yu. (2007). Modelirovaniie NE-faktorov – osnova intellektualnykh kompiuternykh tekhnolohii [Modeling of non-factors – the basis for the intellectualization of computer technologies]. Systemni doslidzhennia ta informatsiini tekhnolohii – Systematic advances and information technologies, 1, (pp. 39-61) [in Russian].

Vladimirovna, I.G. (2021). The prospects of the usage of foresight research in the interests of rocket and space industry. Proceedings from AIP Conference: Academic Space Conference: Dedicated to the Memory of Academician S.P. Korolev and Other Outstanding Russian Scientists – Pioneers of Space Exploration, (Vol. 20318). Retrived from https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/5.0035747 [in English].

Yena, O.V., & Popov, N.V. (2019). Metodolohiia razrobotki patentnykh landshaftov proektnoho ofisa FIPS [Methodology for the development of patent landscapes of the FIPS project office]. Stankoinstrument – Machine tool, 1 (014), (pp. 28-35) [in Russian].

Zhanbayev, R., Sagintayeva, S., Ainur, A., & Nazarov, A. (2020). The use of the foresight methods in developing an algorithm for conducting qualitative examination of the research activities results on the example of the republic of Kazakhstan. Mathematics, (Vol. 8), 11, (pp. 1-19). Retrived from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345810796_The_Use_of_the_Foresight_Methods_in_Developing_an_Algorithm_for_Conducting_Qualitative_Examination_of_the_Research_Activities_Results_on_the_Example_of_the_Republic_of_Kazakhstan [in English].

Zhgurovskyi, M.Z. (2015). Forsait ekonomiky Ukrainy [Foresight of the Ukrainian economy]. Kyiv: NTUU «KPI» [in Ukrainian].

Zhgurovskyi, N.Z. (2000). Systemna metodolohiia tekhnolohichnoho peredbachennia. [System methodology of technological prediction]. Кyiv: vydavnytstvo «Politekhnika» [in Ukrainian].

Zhgurovskyi, N.Z., & Pankratova, N.D. (2005). Tekhnolohicheskoie predvideniie [Technological foresight]. Кyiv: vydavnytstvo «Politekhnika» [in Russian].

Zinchenko, M.A. (2012). Obzor metodov provedeniia forsait [Overview of Foresight Research Methods]. Innovatika i ekspertiza – Innovation and expertise, 2 (9), (pp. 155-158) [in Russian].

Zoloatreva, M.E. (2016). Primeneniie forsait-proiektov v formirovanii stratehii innovatsionnoho razvitiia vysokotekhnolohichnykh kompanii [The use of foresight projects in the formation of a strategy for the innovative development of high-tech companies]. MIR (Modelirovaniie, Innovatsii, Razvitiie) – MID (Modernization, Innovation. Development.), (Vol 7), 4, (pp. 108-114) [in Russian].

Downloads


Abstract views: 640

Published

2021-05-24

How to Cite

Yemelyanov, V., Kovalenko, I., & Honcharova, N. (2021). Principles and methods of forsite research in public management and administration. Public Administration and Regional Development, (12), 408–432. https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2021.12.05

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>