Legal aspects of liability in the field of infringement of intellectual property rights: global experience and Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2022.17.10Keywords:
intellectual property, legal aspects, world experience, copyright, protection of intellectual property rightsAbstract
The article analyzes the main stages of the formation of the concept of "copyright" as an integral component of intellectual property. The international experience of legal responsibility for infringement of intellectual property rights has been studied. It is noted that in our country such conditions have not yet been created for subjects of intellectual property rights under which they could be sure of the protection and inviolability of the results of their intellectual activity. Attention is focused on the fact that copyright is one of the important institutions of intellectual property law, which regulates social relations related to the creation of works of science, literature and art, the disposal of exclusive rights to these works, as well as the protection of exclusive and other rights of the author and his successors and other right holders. It is shown that the relations between Ukraine and the EU in the field of intellectual property rights protection take place in the format of a dialogue that takes place in the format of joint meetings, where the issues of intellectual property rights protection, combating violations, compulsory licensing, etc., and the organization of joint meetings at the level of experts are considered.
According to available research data of the Property Rights Alliance, the index of property rights in Ukraine, the so-called International Property Rights Index (IPRI), is too low compared to EU countries.
However, it was concluded that the problem of intellectual property rights protection is an international one, and therefore the world community focuses its efforts and implements an active policy to ensure the proper level of protection of human intellectual rights, through the creation of an effective legal mechanism for the protection of intellectual property rights. World experience is an important positive tool, by analyzing it, you can find the necessary key ways to reform legislation in the field of intellectual property in Ukraine.
References
2. Dyrektyva YeS «Pro harmonizatsiiu okremykh aspektiv avtorskoho prava i sumizhnykh prav u informatsiinomu suspilstvi» vid 22.05.2001 r. № 2001/29/IeS [EU Directive «On Harmonization of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society» dated May 22, 2001 No. 2001/29/EC]. (2001, May 22). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi rady Ukrainy: ofitsiinyi veb-portal – Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine: official web portal. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_005-01#Text [in Ukrainian].
3. Dyrektyva № 2004/48/IeS Yevropeiskoho parlamentu i Rady YeS pro zabezpechennia prav na intelektualnu vlasnist: YeS; Dyrektyva, Mizhnarodnyi dokument vid 29.04.2004 № 2004/48/IeS [Directive No. 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of the EU on ensuring intellectual property rights: EU; Directive, International document dated 04/29/2004 No. 2004/48/EC] (2004, April 29) Vidomosti Verkhovnoi rady Ukrainy: ofitsiinyi veb-portal – Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine: official web portal. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_b39# Text [in Ukrainian].
4. Shabalin, A. (2019). Deiaki pytannia zakhystu prava intelektualnoi vlasnosti v YeS [Some issues of protection of intellectual property rights in the EU]. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti – Theory and practice of intellectual property, 6, 46-54 [in Ukrainian].
5. Pro vnesennia zmin do statti 5 Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro rozpovsiudzhennia prymirnykiv audiovizualnykh tvoriv, fonohram, videohram, kompiuternykh prohram, baz danykh». Zakon Ukrainy vid 04.09.2018 № 2514-VII [On amendments to Article 5 of the Law of Ukraine «On the distribution of copies of audiovisual works, phonograms, videograms, computer programs, databases». Law of Ukraine dated September 4, 2018 No. 2514-VII]. (2018, September 4). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady (VVR) – Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada (VVR), 41, article 315 [in Ukrainian].
6. Pro zatverdzhennia kryteriiv, za yakymy otsiniuietsia stupin ryzyku vid provadzhennia hospodarskoi diialnosti u sferi intelektualnoi vlasnosti ta vyznachaietsia periodychnist provedennia planovykh zakhodiv derzhavnoho nahliadu (kontroliu) Ministerstvom ekonomichnoho rozvytku i torhivli Ukrainy: Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy [On the approval of the criteria by which the degree of risk from conducting business activities in the field of intellectual property is assessed and the periodicity of planned measures of state supervision (control) by the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine is determined: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine]. (2018, October 31). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi rady Ukrainy: ofitsiinyi veb-portal – Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine: official web portal. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/912-2018-%D0%BF#Text [in Ukrainian].
7. Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo vdoskonalennia okhorony prav na komponuvannia napivprovidnykovykh vyrobiv: Zakon Ukrainy vid 19.09.2019 № 111-IX [On the introduction of changes to some legislative acts of Ukraine regarding the improvement of the protection of rights to the composition of semiconductor products: Law of Ukraine dated September 19, 2019 No. 111-IX]. (2019, September 19). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady (VVR) – Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada (VVR), 42, article 236 [in Ukrainian].
8. Ievrointehratsiinyi portal [European integration portal]. eu-ua.org. Retrieved from http://eu-ua.org/yevrointehratsiia/zakhyst-prav-intelektualnoii-vlasnosti [in Ukrainian].
9. Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo posylennia okhorony i zakhystu prav na torhovelni marky i promyslovi zrazky ta borotby z patentnymy zlovzhyvanniamy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 21.07.2020 № 815-IX [On making changes to some legislative acts of Ukraine regarding strengthening the protection and protection of rights to trademarks and industrial designs and combating patent abuse: Law of Ukraine dated 07/21/2020 No. 815-IX]. (2020, July, 21). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi rady Ukrainy: ofitsiinyi veb-portal – Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine: official web portal. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/815-20#Text [in Ukrainian].
10. Kozhokar, O. (2020). VR pryiniala zakony u sferi zakhystu prav intelektualnoi vlasnosti: shcho novoho u tsykh zakonakh? [VR adopted laws in the field of protection of intellectual property rights: what is new in these laws?]. Yurydychna hazeta «Online» – Legal newspaper «Online». Retrieved from https://yur-gazeta.com/dumka-eksperta/vr-priynyala-zakoni-u-sferi-zahistu-prav-intelektualnoyi-vlasnosti-shcho-novogo-u-cih-zakonah-.html [in Ukrainian].
11. WIPO: ofitsiinyi veb-portal [WIPO: Official Web Portal]. wipo.int. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/about-wipo/ru/index.html [in Russian].
12. Khartiia osnovnykh prav Yevropeiskoho soiuzu: Yevropeiskyi Soiuz; Khartiia, Mizhnarodnyi dokument vid 07.12.2000 [Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: European Union; Charter, International document dated 07.12.2000]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi rady Ukrainy: ofitsiinyi veb-portal – Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine: official web portal. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_524#Text [in Ukrainian].
13. Bakala, A. A. (2016). Kompiuterne piratstvo: shliakhy podolannia ta mizhnarodnyi dosvid borotby z nym [Computer piracy: ways to overcome it and international experience of combating it]. Chasopys tsyvilistyky – Journal of Civil Studies, issue 20, 207-210 [in Ukrainian].
14. Romaniuk, T. V. (2015). Zakhyst korysnykh modelei za zakonodavstvom Kytaiu [Protection of utility models under Chinese legislation]. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava – Journal of the Kyiv University of Law, 2, 264-266. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Chkup_2015_2_64 [in Ukrainian].
15. Stadnyk, O. I. (2014). Stratehiia intelektualnoi vlasnosti v Yaponii [The strategy of intellectual property in Japan]. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky – Global and national economic problems, (issue 2), (pp. 143-148). Mykolaiv: Mykolaivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni V.O. Sukhomlynskoho [in Ukrainian].
16. Lonh, D., Rei, P., Zharov, V. O., Sheveleva, T. M., Vasylenko, I. E. & Drobiazko, V. S. (2007). Zakhyst prav intelektualnoi vlasnosti: normy mizhnarodnoho i natsionalnoho zakonodavstva ta yikh pravozastosuvannia. Praktychnyi posibnyk [Protection of intellectual property rights: norms of international and national legislation and their enforcement. Practical guide]. Kyiv: «K.I.S.» [in Ukrainian].
17. Butnik-Siverskyi, O. B. (2008). Ekonomika intelektualnoi vlasnosti [Economics of intellectual property]. Kyiv: Instytut intelektualnoi vlasnosti i prava [in Ukrainian].
18. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [Constitution of Ukraine]. Zakon Ukrainy № 254k/96-VR vid 23.07.1996 r. [Law of Ukraine No. 254k/96-ВР of 07/23/1996]. (1996, July 23). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy – Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, article 141 [in Ukrainian].
19. Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy № 435-IV vid 03.10.2003 r. [Civil Code of Ukraine No. 435-IV dated October 3, 2003]. (2003, October 3). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy – Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 40-44, article 356 [in Ukrainian].
20. International SME Support Service. china-iprhelpdesk.eu. Retrieved from http://www.china-iprhelpdesk.eu/frontpage [in English].
21. File 91 1591-D-2017 from the House of Representatives and file № 1315-S-2016 from the Senate. congress.gov. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/ [in English].
22. Acts on trademarks. ipindia.nic.in. Retrieved from http://www.ipindia.nic.in/acts-rules-tm.htm&usg=ALkJrhgHrx8tYL8wMKT3YPpIdwyCfUG-Ag [in English].
23. Summary of the assessment of the situation by country. gov.cn. Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/english/2008-06/21/content_1023471.htm [in English].
24. European Neighborhood Policy And Enlargement Negotiations. ec.europa.eu. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/neighbourhood/overview_uk [in English].
25. ASEAN IP Rights Action Plan 2016-2025. aseanip.org. Retrieved from https://www.aseanip.org/Statistics-Resources/ASEAN-IPR-Action-Plan-2016 [in English].
26. Patent law, RSC (1985). p. 4. laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. Retrieved from http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/P-4.pdf [in English].
27. McNeely, R. J. (2008). Governmental indirect patent infringement: the need to hold Uncle Sam ac-countable under 28 U.S.C. §1498 / CAP. U. Law Review [in English].
28. Stark, R. J. (2011). Inducement of Patent Infringement: The Intent Standard and Circumstantial Evidence of Intent. Recent Trends in Patent Infringement Lawsuits [in English].
29. Indeks prav vlasnosti [Index of property rights]. Retrieved from http://iii.ua/uk/ukrayina-v-globalnih-innovaciynih-reytingah-mizhnarodniy-indeks-zahistu-prav-vlasnosti
30. Property rights alliance. ueff.org/uk Retrieved from https://ueff.org/uk/indeksy/77-property- rights-alliance-indeks-prav-vlasnosti [in English].
31. Report on the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights in third countries. Commission staff working document. Brussels, 8.1.2020 SWD(2019) 452 final/2. trade.ec.europa.eu Retrieved from https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2020/january/tradoc_158561.pdf [in English].
32. Vinaeva, K. (2007). Avtorski ta sumizhni prava: aspekty tsyvilno-pravovoho zakhystu [Copyright and related rights: aspects of civil protection]. Yurydychna hazeta – Legal newspaper, №17 (101) yur- gazeta.com Retrieved from http://www.yur- gazeta.com/article/1172. [in Ukrainian].









.png)






.png)


















