Contents of the concept of intellectual property in the constitutional section: the experience of foreign countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2023.21.06Keywords:
intellectual property, constitutionalization, national constitutional values, constitutional protection, proportionality, private and public interestsAbstract
The article examines modern trends in the constitutional and legal protection of intellectual property with the help of a comparative analysis of the development of the legal institution of intellectual property. It is concluded that the need to ensure the rights of citizens, national security, and the creation of an innovative economy determine the directions of world constitutional development, one of which is the constitutionalization of the legal institute of intellectual property. There are two main methods of constitutionalization: legislative and interpretive.
The subjective constitutional right to intellectual property performs a special "social function", which consists in ensuring an optimal balance between private and public interests.
Constitutionalization is a global trend in the modern development of states and is expressed in the universalization and intensification of the influence of constitutional values on the institutions of different legal systems, which significantly contributes to their convergence. The conclusion that intellectual property is part of the basic constitutional principles of many foreign states. Therefore, among the foundations of the constitutional system, a new principle related to the development of intellectual property relations should be highlighted, including their stimulation, encouragement, guarantee and support in order to achieve economic and social progress of society aimed at building an innovative (based on the knowledge economy) state.
Objectively existing differences between states in the tasks of constitutional regulation, the level of development of intellectual property relations and the degree of their regulation in the current legislation, in the observance of the traditions of constitutional regulation and the propensity of the constitutional legislator to include modern novelties from the constitutions of other countries give rise to new approaches to the constitutional regulation of intellectual property relations, and also entail the emergence of «mixed» models. All this makes the issue of constitutional regulation of intellectual property rights an interesting and promising object of scientific research.
References
2. Dakhno, I. I. (2006). Pravo intelektualnoi vlasnosti [Intellectual property law] (2nd ed., rev.). Kyiv : Tsentr navchalnoi literatury [in Ukrainian].
3. Kurhanova, D.R. (2017). Zakhyst prava intelektualnoi vlasnosti: vitchyznianyi ta zarubizhnyi dosvid [Protection of intellectual property rights: domestic and foreign experience]. M.P. Yunin (Eds.), Aktualni problemy tsyvilnoho, trudovoho ta hospodarskoho prava: teoriia ta praktyka v suchasnykh umovakh – Actual problems of civil, labor and economic law: theory and practice in modern conditions: Materials of the All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference, (pp. 155-158). Dnipro: Vydavets Bila K.O. [in Ukrainian].
4. Lonh, D., Patrytsiia, R., Zharov, V., Sheveleva, T., Vasylenko, I., & Drobiazko V. (2007). Zakhyst prav intelektualnoi vlasnosti: normy mizhnarodnoho i natsionalnoho zakonodavstva ta yikh pravozastosuvannia [Protection of intellectual property rights: norms of international and national legislation and their enforcement]. Kyiv: «K.I.S.» [in Ukrainian].
5. Romashko, A.S., Verba, I.I., & Pryhoda, V.V. (2015). Mizhnarodni dohovory ta uhody u sferi intelek tualnoi vlasnosti [International treaties and agreements in the sphere of intellectual property]. Kyiv : NTUU «KPI». Retrieved from http://ela.kpi.ua/handle/ 123456789/28002 [in Ukrainian].
6. Khridochkin, A.V., Khridochkina A.A., & Leonova O.V. (2014). Intelektualna vlasnist [Intellectual property]. Dnipropetrovsk: DHU. [in Ukrainian].
7. Tsybulov, P.M. (2005). Osnovy intelektualnoi vlasnosti [Fundamentals of intellectual property]. Kyiv: «Instytut intelektualnoi vlasnosti i prava» [in Ukrainian].
8. Luts, V.V. (Ed.). (2007). Osobysti nemainovi prava intelektualnoi vlasnosti tvortsiv [Personal non-property intellectual property rights of creators]. Ternopil: pidruchnyky i posibnyky [in Ukrainian].
9. Shyshka, R.B. (2002). Okhorona prava intelektualnoi vlasnosti: avtorsko-pravovyi aspect [Protection of intellectual property rights: copyright aspect]. Kharkiv: Vydavnytstvo Natsionalnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav [in Ukrainian].
10. Shtefan, O.S. (2006). Poniattia obiektu avtorskoho prava ta kryteriiv yoho okhoronozdatnosti [The concept of the object of copyright and the criteria for its protection]. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti – Theory and practice of intellectual property, 6, (pp. 3-8) [in Ukrainian].
11. Kharytonova, O.I. (2012). Spivvidnoshennia katehorii «pravovidnosyny intelektualnoi vlasnosti» ta «rehuliatyvni, orhanizatsiini, okhoronni tsyvilni pravovidnosyny» [Correlation of the categories «legal relations of intellectual property» and «regulatory, organizational, protective civil legal relations»]. Aktualni problemy derzhavy ta prava – Actual problems of the state and law, 65, (pp. 115-125) [in Ukrainian].
12. Tokarieva, V.O. (2020). Shchodo pytannia zakhystu prav intelektualnoi vlasnosti [Regarding the protection of intellectual property rights]. Chasopys tsyvilistyky – Journal of Civil Studies, 36, (pp. 51-56) [in Ukrainian].
13. Pravo intelektualnoi vlasnosti [Intellectual property law]. (2007). Kyiv: In Yure [in Ukrainian].
14. Paladii, M. (2011). Protsedurne zabezpechennia upravlinnia sferoiu intelektualnoi vlasnosti v Ukraini [Procedural management of intellectual property in Ukraine]. Derzhavne upravlinnia ta mistseve samovriaduvannia – State administration and local self-government, 4 (11), (pp. 76-84) [in Ukrainian].
15. Opolska, N.M. (2019). Obmezhennia obsiahu prava na svobodu tvorchosti u mizhnarodno-pravovykh aktakh [Limiting the scope of the right to freedom of creativity in international legal acts]. V.P. Andrushchenko, Yu.S. Shemshuchenko, O.O. Rafalskyi (Ed.). Pravnycho-politolohichni ta istorychni studii problem ukrainskoho derzhavotvorennia – Legal, political and historical studies of the problems of Ukrainian state formation: Materials of the All-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference, (pp. 171-173). Kyiv: Vyd-vo NPU imeni M.P. Drahomanova. Retrieved from http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/28814 [in Ukrainian].
16. Mazurenko, S.V. (2007). Problemy administratyvno-pravovoi okhorony ta zakhystu prav intelektualnoi vlasnosti: natsionalnyi ta mizhnarodnyi dosvid [Problems of administrative and legal protection and protection of intellectual property rights: national and international experience]. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava – Actual problems of the state and law, 35, (pp. 383-388) [in Ukrainian].
17. Shemshuchenko, Yu.S., & Boshytskyi, Yu.L. (Ed.). (2002). Intelektualna vlasnist v Ukraini: problemy teorii i praktyky [Intellectual property in Ukraine: problems of theory and practice]. Kyiv: Instytut derzhavy i prava im. V.M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
18. Bazylevych, V.D. (2014). Intelektualna vlasnist [Intellectual property].(3nd ed., rev.). Kyiv: Znannia [in Ukrainian].
19. Idris, K. (2015). Intellectual property is a powerful tool of economic growth. WIPO Publication, 888, (pp. 328-329) [in English].
20. Kapinos, M.M., Lerantovych, E.T., & Soloshchuk, M.M. (2016). Intelektualna vlasnist [Intellectual property]. Kharkiv: NTU «KhPI» [in Ukrainian].
21. Sviatotskyi, O.D. (Ed.). (2003). Zakhyst prav intelektualnoi vlasnosti: dosvid Spoluchenykh Shtativ Ameryky [Protection of intellectual property rights: the experience of the United States of America]. Kyiv: In Yure [in Ukrainian].
22. Iavorska, O.S. (Ed.). (2016). Intelektualne pravo Ukrainy [Intellectual law of Ukraine]. Ternopil: Pidruchnyky i posibnyky [in Ukrainian].
.png)
.png)
