FEATURES OF BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS IN THE SPHERE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2025.28.10Keywords:
communication, business communication, public administration system, management decisions, business communication, information exchange, professional activity, communication barriers, mutual exchange of information.Abstract
The article is devoted to the urgent problem of analyzing business communications at different levels of public administration as a way of improving the quality and accessibility of public services. Business communication is the basis of the vital activity of any structure, subdivisions, bodies that are components of the public administration system and represent public power. Business communications are necessary for the effective implementation of management decisions, feedback, adjustment of the goal and stages of the public administration system's activities, since communicative processes, explanations of policies, and actions of the authorities in general are sometimes uncertain, not systematized, spontaneous, and often unpredictable in terms of their course or consequences. Therefore, today there is a need for theoretical substantiation of the principles of communication in public administration, improvement of its internal and external vectors, development of effective methods and forms for the practical implementation of management functions. The features of communications in the public administration system are considered. It is emphasized that the communicative process plays an important role in public administration, regardless of the form of communication. It is found that the communication process in public administration includes the following elements: public administration institutions and citizens, messages, communication channels, information barriers, feedback. It is emphasized that for successful communication, it is not important how clearly and precisely the transmitted idea is formulated, but how much the interacting parties agree in its interpretations or not. Proposals are formulated to improve the implementation of business communications in the public administration system, in order to increase the efficiency of its functioning and establish effective interaction with society. It is proven that the implementation of effective business communications will stimulate the efficiency of the public administration system, its perception by society and increase the overall level of management activity.
References
Aliiev, A. (2024). Osoblyvosti tsyfrovizatsii u sferi publichnoho upravlinnia [Peculiarities of digitalization in the sphere of public administration]. Vcheni zapysky Universytetu «KROK» Scientific notes of the University «KROK», 2(74), (pp. 237-243). Retrieved from: https://surli.cc/fxhgfj [in Ukrainian].
Andriiash, V. (2023). Osnovni peredumovy reformuvannia publichnoho upravlinnia v umovakh hlobalizatsii [Basic prerequisites for reforming public administration in the context of globalization]. Dniprovskyi naukovyi chasopys publichnoho upravlinnia, psykholohii, prava – Dnipro Scientific Journal of Public Administration, Psychology, and Law, 2. Retrieved from: https://chasopys-ppp.dp.ua/index.php/chasopys/article/view/391/345 [in Ukrainian].
Babchynska, O. (2018). Komunikatsiinyi protses v upravlinni:osnovni polozhennia [Communication process in management: basic provisions]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Effective economy, 9. Retrieved from: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=6539 [in Ukrainian].
Bondar, H., & Andriiash, V. (2018). Rol hromadianskoho suspilstva u dosiahnenni staloho rozvytku ta borotbi z koruptsiieiu v Ukraini [The role of civil society in achieving sustainable development and combating corruption in Ukraine]. Publichne upravlinnia ta rehionalnyi rozvytok – Public administration and regional development, 1. Retrieved from: https://surl.li/jrlkhv [in Ukrainian].
Butenko, O. (2024). Analiz komunikatsiinykh merezh u kulturnykh kontekstakh [Analysis of communication networks in cultural contexts]. Kulturolohichnyi almanakh – Cultural almanac, 2. Retrieved from: https://almanac.npu.kiev.ua/index.php/almanac/article/view/379/355 [in Ukrainian].
Vlasiuk, Ye. (2022). Teoretychni osnovy komunikatsii yak umovy diievoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom [Theoretical foundations of communication as conditions for effective enterprise management]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and society, 40. Retrieved from: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/1465/1410 [in Ukrainian].
Hromadska, N., Malikina, O., & Andriiash, V. (2021). Otsiniuvannia derzhavno-upravlinskykh rishen: modeli ta kryterii [Evaluation of state management decisions: models and criteria]. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok – Public administration: improvement and development, 9. Retrieved from: http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=2201 [in Ukrainian].
Dzvinchuk, D. (2016). Komunikatyvna polityka orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia [Communicative policy of local self-government bodies]. Ivano-Frankivsk [in Ukrainian].
Drahomyretska, N., Kandahura, K., & Bukach, A. (2017). Komunikatyvna diialnist v derzhavnomu upravlinni [Communicative activity in public administration]. Odesa: ORIDU NADU [in Ukrainian].
Yemelianov, V., Shemchuk, Yu., & Andriiash, V. (2016). Vzaiemodiia orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia z terytorialnoiu hromadoiu: komunikatyvnyi aspekt [Interaction of local self-government bodies with the territorial community: communicative aspect]. Naukovi pratsi: naukovo-metodychnyi zhurnal – Scientific works: scientific and methodological journal, 255, (Vol. 267), (pp. 66-73). Mykolaiv : Vyd-vo ChDU im. Petra Mohyly [in Ukrainian].
Ivanov, V. (2008). Vyznachennia masovoi komunikatsii [Definition of mass communication]. Aktualni pytannia masovoi komunikatsii – Current issues of mass communication, 9. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/apmk_2008_9_10 [in Ukrainian].
Komunikatsiia [Communication]. (n.d.). (2025). uk.wikipedia.org. Retrieved from: http://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/ [in Ukrainian].
Kopets, L., & Hordiienko, V. (2008). Zvorotnyi zviazok v protsesakh spilkuvannia: onovlennia pidkhodiv ta metodiv doslidzhennia [Feedback in communication processes: updating approaches and research methods]. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA – Scientific notes of NaUKMA, (Vol. 84), (pp. 49-54) [in Ukrainian].
Kopets, L., & Hordiienko, V. (2009). Stratehii mizhosobovoho zvorotnoho zviazku: rezultaty doslidzhennia [Strategies of interpersonal feedback: research results]. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA – Scientific notes of NaUKMA, (Vol. 97), (pp. 50-54) [in Ukrainian].
Krysko, Zh. (2021). Rol dilovykh komunikatsii v upravlinni orhanizatsiieiu [The role of business communications in organizational management]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and society, 24. Retrieved from: https://surl.li/xzctff [in Ukrainian].
Miazova, I. (2008). Mizhkulturna komunikatsiia: zmist, sutnist ta osoblyvosti proiavu (sotsialno-filosofskyi analiz) [Intercultural communication: content, essence and features of manifestation (social and philosophical analysis)]. Kyiv: Kyivskyi natsionalnyi un-t im. Tarasa Shevchenka. Retrieved from: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/ard/2008/08miysfa.zip [in Ukrainian].
Nadzhafli, E. (2022). Tsyfrova derzhava v konteksti pravovoi reformy v Ukraini: teoretyko-pravovyi aspekt [Digital state in the context of legal reform in Ukraine: theoretical and legal aspect]. Pravo i bezpeka – Law and Security, 2 (85). Retrieved from: https://pb.univd.edu.ua/index.php/PB/article/download/628/482/&ved=WJo [in Ukrainian].
Ostapenko, M. (2012). Politychna komunikatsiia: teoretychni aspekty doslidzhennia [Political communication: theoretical aspects of research]. Politychnyi menedzhment – Political management, 3. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/PoMe_2012_3_17 [in Ukrainian].
Pavlov, M. (2021). Osoblyvosti protsesu tsyfrovizatsii publichnoho upravlinnia v rozvynutykh krainakh [Peculiarities of the process of digitalization of public administration in developed countries]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid – Investments: practice and experience, 15, (pp. 140-144) [in Ukrainian].
Palekha, Yu. (2011). Orhanizatsiia suchasnoi dilovoi komunikatsii [Organization of modern business communication]. Ekonomichnyi chasopys-XXI – Economic magazine-XXI, 3-4, (pp. 59-63). Kyiv: Sofiia-A [in Ukrainian].
Proskurina, V. (2009). Komunikatsiia i komunikatyvni bariery: Sotsialno-psykholohichnyi pidkhid [Communication and communicative barriers: a socio-psychological approach]. Naukovi pratsi. MAUP – Scientific works. MAUP, 3(22), (pp. 190-197) [in Ukrainian].
Rachynska, O. (2018). Formuvannia modeli komunikatyvnoi vzaiemodii u sferi publichnoho upravlinnia [Formation of a model of communicative interaction in the sphere of public administration]. Derzhavno-upravlinski studii – State management studies, 5 (7) [in Ukrainian].
Tverdokhliebov, Ye. (2014). Teoretychni zasady doslidzhennia komunikatyvnoi vzaiemodii v publichnomu upravlinni [Theoretical principles of the study of communicative interaction in public administration]. Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia – Theory and practice of state management, 2, (pp. 82-91) [in Ukrainian].
Torkhova, N., & Andriiash, V. (2018). Komunikatsiina stratehiia yak instrument formuvannia zviazkiv z hromadskistiu u sferi publichnoho upravlinnia: osoblyvosti zastosuvannia v orhanakh pravosuddia [Communication strategy as a tool for forming public relations in the sphere of public administration: features of application in judicial bodies]. Publichne upravlinnia ta rehionalnyi rozvytok – Public administration and regional development, 2. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/purr_2018_2_3. [in Ukrainian].
Tryhub, K. & Plokhykh, V. (2009) Sotsialno-komunikatyvna problematyka u doslidzhenniakh derzhavno-upravlinskykh vidnosyn [Social and communicative issues in the study of state-administrative relations]. Naukovi pratsi. Derzhavne upravlinnia – Scientific works. State administration, 112, (Vol. 125), (pp. 38-41). Mykolaiv: Vyd-vo MDHU im. P. Mohyly [in Ukrainian].
Chaplai, I. (2017). Komunikatsiia v derzhavi ta suspilstvi: terminoznavchi aspekty [Communication in the state and society: terminological aspects]. Elektronnyi zhurnal «Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok» – Electronic journal «State administration: improvement and development», 8. Retrieved from: http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=1109 [in Ukrainian].
Chekshturina, V., & Zyma, O. (2025). Aktualni formaty biznes komunikatsii pochatku ХХI ct. [Current formats of business communications of the beginning of the 21st century]. Retrieved from: http://repository.hneu.edu.ua/bitstream.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Cuilenburg, J.J. van. (2007). The Information Society: Some Trends and Implications. European Journal of Communication, (Vol.2), 1, (pp. 105-121) [in English].
Katz, D. (1966). The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: John Willey [in English].
Miege, B. (1999). La societe conquise par la communication. Grenoble [in French].
Rosengren, K.E. (2013). From field to frog ponds. Journal of communication, 43(3), (pp. 78-94) [in English].
Vickers, M. (2011). The revolution in military affairs and military capabilities. War іn thе іnformation аgе: new challenges for U.S. sесurіtу роliсу. Washington etc. [in English].
.png)
.png)
